Spinning off a separate topic.
===
In http://www.geni.com/discussions/151981?msg=1061550 Sharon Doubell wrote:
"Well, the point is that Geni isn't selling accuracy, or the illusion of it. They're selling collaboration.
"That truth and accuracy are not reified, but the long term results of the process of negotiations, even in academic disciplines, is difficult for the passive cut and pasters to accept.
"It's like criticising a leopard for not being a cheetah, because you prefer cheetahs. The leopard doesn't become an illusion because it's not what you want to see.
"Geni isn't an illusion because it's not a history book. It's something altogether different, and to my mind, discussing what it is would be far more interesting than endless complaints about the fact that it isn't a cheetah."
===
Perhaps easiest to start with what Geni is NOT.