Arguments for an 'Also Known As' field in addition to 'Maiden Name'

Started by Terry Jackson (Switzer) on Tuesday, December 28, 2010
Showing all 2 posts
12/28/2010 at 5:50 AM

I have instances in my family and am sure they exist widely where a person has changed their name not because they married but for other reasons. It is wrong to say a man has a maiden name and I actually like the 'maiden name' field as it has a purpose (at least in English tradtion it has) but the AKA field should be searchable and is of greater importance than a nickname. It could also be useful where there are variant spellings.

Private User
12/28/2010 at 9:52 AM

It looks a good idea. There are a lot of people in my tree known by name of their main book. So, the book name added to the family. It will be nice to have a separate field for such purpose.

Showing all 2 posts

Create a free account or login to participate in this discussion