Thomas Lane - No Evidence Samuel & Jane Lane Had a Son Named Thomas

Started by Mattheiss Riegell XII on today
Problem with this page?

Participants:

Profiles Mentioned:

There are no known reliable primary sources about a Thomas Lane who was a child of Samuel Lane and Jane Corbin. A search of the primary sources at Ancestry, FamilySearch, and MyHeritage produced nothing. Neither Frederick Schultz,[1] nor Robert Barnes[2] list Thomas as a child of Samuel and Jane Lane. Larry James did in an early version of his work but subsequently removed him in an update.[3]

This profile should be orphaned from the existing family, since it's not clear who this person represents, and there's no compelling evidence that Samuel and Jane Lane had a son named Thomas. Since there are no descendants, this action wouldn't affect any potential relatives.
=== References ===
1 Schultz, Frederick V., A Reminiscence Sung 1559-1999 (Waynesboro, Virginia: self-published, 2000; Rootsweb, accessed 22 Feb 2024) http://freepages.rootsweb.com/~rawl/family/reminiscence.html.
2 Robert W Barnes, Baltimore County Families, 1659-1759 (Ancestry, accessed 18 March 2024), pp. 392-393, https://www.ancestry.com/search/collections/48162/
3 Larry A. James, The Lane Family: The Descendants of Maj. Samuel Lane (Neosho, Missouri: self-published, 1986; available online at FamilySearch, accessed 24 Feb 2024) Part 1, pp. 18-19, and Part 2, p. 4, https://libcat.familysearch.org/Record/2030212.

Create a free account or login to participate in this discussion