I'm curious about the reasoning behind the statement regarding the absence of burial or estate documents for Thomas Warren of Ripple around late 1645 or early 1646. It's mentioned that it's improbable to consider that Thomas's uncle John and brother Albert were either intentionally misleading or misinformed in the lawsuits concerning Thomas Warren's fate.
It’s noted that no burial or estate documents have been found. Could this be attributed to the possibility that such documents might be located in America, considering the era's migration patterns?
It seems plausible that Thomas's family members might have been aware of his journey to America. The lack of documentation does indeed add an element of uncertainty to historical assertions. I'm aware that the absence of concrete evidence does not necessarily confirm any particular narrative.
Could there be additional context or overlooked details that might shed more light on this historical puzzle?
