https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Nunn-275
Various sites on the internet claim that Francis Nunn Sr. of this profile was the son of John Nunn (Nunn-277) and Mary Richardson (Richardson-4665). Peter Nunn (Nunn-1558) and Thomas Nunn (Nunn-294) are often claimed as Francis Nunn Sr’s sibling in these unsourced pedigree sites. Although occasional variations appear, alleged father John Nunn is generally shown born c. 1660 in Lancaster County Va. and his wife about 1665 in Maryland. The two allegedly move to Chesterfield County, Virginia area. Chesterfield County was created in 1749, but most of these pedigree sites ignore that and claim earlier events there. There were Nunns in Chesterfield County, Virginia in the 1700’s. However, nothing appears to connect them to Francis Nunn Sr. of this page, other than someone, at sometime, “squeezing” him into the family in their pedigree, followed by others copying the claim in their own unsourced pedigrees.
Two books have been written on the branch of the Nunn family headed by Francis Nunn Sr. Both were developed with imput by teams of genealogists who sought out every available record that could pertain to Francis Nunn Sr. These groups knew this branch of Nunns as well as anyone, and far better than most. This is what the book “Nunns of the South reported on the topic: Page 24: “Partially due to the abundance of early Virginia Nunns, a great deal of time and effort was spent attempting to tie known North Carolina lines to those in Virginia. We never got enough facts to reach any conclusions.” And on page 27 it stated: “Our family story really begins in North Carolina in 1729 with Francis Nunn in Craven County, where he came from we do not know.”
The book “John Nunn, Revolutionary Soldier…” deals mostly with Francis Nunn Sr.’s grandson John, but chapter one deals with Francis Nunn Sr and the next two chapters with his sons William and Francis Jr. On page 1, this book reiterates the statements in “Nunns of the South” stating: “There are numerous records of Nunns arriving in this country before 1623. And they continued to come here through the years. Most of the early ones settled in Virginia and New England and apparently were a distinctly different group from the ones that originally settled in the Carolinas. There is a wealth of material available on the Virginia Nunns. As yet, none of the family researchers has been able to tie the two groups together in this country. No doubt they have common roots in England, but evidently not here.”
Another seemingly baseless claim that goes hand in hand with the above claims of parents and siblings is that Francis Nunn Sr.’s wife was Naomi Barrett (Barrett-5196). Again the book “John Nunn, Revolutionary Soldier…” disavows this claim stating: “We have never learned the name of Francis Nunn I’s wife…”. They didn’t learn because they didn’t look. In the prefice they state: “Extensive research was done in archives, historical societies, libraries, courthouses, etc., in North and South Carolina and Georgia. Many British and Colonial records were also searched…. Every effort was made to go back to the basic materials rather than using the interpretations of others.”
Even when disappointing, we need to stick with the work of diligent researchers who cite primary source records and make logical interpretations, not accept unsourced statements in whimsical pedigrees. This page has currently been viewed by 1425 viewers, some of which have undoubtedly taken it’s material and woven it into their own unsourced pedigrees. For that reason alone, we cannot allow unproven, and probably incorrect, information to linger. This note contains all the linking I.D.s to the above relationships which will now be removed. Therefore, they can easily be reestablished if proven.
5th great grandfather of Pres. Jimmy Carter. Also former Secretary of Defense and Georgia Senator Sam Nunn, who, like Carter, was a descendant of Francis' grandson John Nunn, Revolutionary War Soldier.
Children:[2]
"This Francis Nunn died intestate in 1738, leaving a wife and four known children: William, Francis, Ann and Elizabeth. As he died intestate, the plantation became the right of his son, William, as eldest son and heir according to the Old English law of Primogeniture. William later gave or sold some of this land to his brother Francis...Nothing further is known of Anna and Elizabeth, nor the maiden name of Francis wife."[3]
Gary Pinson
The Nunn Y-DNA project Patriarchs page at https://web.archive.org/web/20180523074417/https://www.worldfamilie... lists a long undocumented pedigree starting with a “John Nunn b 1450 Rattlesden, Suffolk, England” and descending seven more generations to a “John Nunn b 1660 VA d 1700 VA m Mary Richardson” and their purported son “Francis Nunn b 1687 Craven, NC d 1738 Craven, NC m Naomi Barrett.” The inplication is that this is all proven with Y-DNA results, which of course can’t be true.
Y-DNA results if substantial enough and analyzed correctly can give a probability of relationship between two people taking the test. But it can’t order a pedigree. When dealing with pre 18th century pedigrees, proof needs to be established at every single generation, generally through one, or more, wills with additional supporting evidence. That is not at all easy to do and can only be done with a line that is substantially wealthy enough to produce enough primary source documents.
The Patriarchs page above also indicates there were two Y-Dna tests applied to this pedigree. One, #63396, to a descendant of William Nunn Sr and the other, #N56700, to a descendant of his brother Francis Nunn Jr. It would be interesting to see what those test results indicated. Based on my experience with the Pinson Y-DNA project, I’d expect them to show a genetic distance of at least 4. Francis Nunn Sr., who is the most recent common ancestor (MRCA) of the two lines is my 7th great grandfather. In my Pinson line, the MRCA was also my 7th great grandfather and the representatives of his two sons had a genetic distance of 5. All that means is the relationship is very old, which we already knew from our genealogical evidence.
But I couldn’t view the results for the two tests above. In one place the Nunn Y-DNA project indicates there may be 38 test takers (it states 38 members). However, the Nunn Y-DNA results page only shows 7 results with only 3 showing a Nunn ancestor. Neither test numbers N56700, nor 63396 are shown. See: https://web.archive.org/web/20180523074417/https://www.worldfamilie...
But, this is a mute point. All the Y-DNA results of the two tests could possibly prove is that the descendants of William Nunn Sr and his brother Francis Nunn Jr. were related. They could not hope to prove the names of their MRCA nor his father or grandfather. To hope to do so, you’d need a test taker (preferably more than one) on a different Nunn branch that could trace his ancestry, with substantial proof at each generation, to someone merge older than Francis Nunn Sr. Then, you could theorize that that Nunn branch merged with our Nunn line at some point in the far distant past, but only guess at where. In other words, the Y-DNA evidence could support a strong genealogical case, but not prove anything more than a distant relationship on it’s own.
Both the alleged wife of Francis Nunn Sr. and his alleged parents, seem to have been derived from this Patriarchs page without any genealogical evidence. Therefore, there is absolutely no reason to include them on Francis Nunn Sr’s profile, other than as a note to researchers indicating the claim made, without evidence, on said Nunn Y-DNA project Patriarch’s page.
If, I am wrong, please prove me wrong showing the evidence and logic in the proof. Believe me, as a descendant of Francis Nunn Sr., I am not trying to rock the boat. I am trying to uncover the truth about our ancestors without being led down the wrong pathway by a baseless claim.
Detaching from Francis Nunn, Sr.