Hugh Fraser, 1st Lord Lovat - Wrong parents

References uploaded

https://archive.org/details/scotspeeragefoun05paul/page/522/mode/2up

http://clanfraser.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/clan-fraser-family...

So http://thepeerage.com/p39239.htm#i392382 which is Burke’s based had Hugh Fraser, 1st Lord Fraser of Lovat parents as Hugh & Janet.

But The Scots Peerage, which is a more modern, accurate and cited source, doesn’t show this Hugh Fraser, 8th of Lovat at all, and expresses skepticism at the existence of Janet Dunbar.

The source, MacKenzie, Alexander. "History of the Frasers of Lovat, with Genealogies of the Principal Families of the Name to which is Added Those of Dunballoch and Phopachy", Inverness: A & W Mackenzie,1896, Archive.org, p. 57, https://archive.org/details/historyoffrasers00mackuoft/page/57/mode... has a much bigger family, doesn’t seem to have Thomas, and doesn’t cite their work. I’m not sure how reliable this source is.

The most recent source from Clan Fraser follows The Scots Peerage with an addition of two sons for Hugh, 1st Lord Lovat, rather than only one in TSP.

I guess the next step is to prune extra children.

Children of Hugh Fraser, 1st Lord Fraser of Lovat not supported by the modern Clan Fraser of Lovat have been detached and attached to N.N. Fraser Agnes Fraser; Anne Fraser; John Fraser; Janet Fraser; Alexander Fraser, 1st of Farraline

Wikipedia describes the Lord Lovat and the differing numbering schemes here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lord_Lovat

In my opinion, using the research of the modern Clan Fraser, as described in this document:

https://www.geni.com/documents/view?doc_id=6000000190038669875 (feel free to tag to more profiles)

Is Geni”s best course of action.