Renauld de Courtenay, Seigneur de Courtenay - Disputed origins

Started by Erica Howton on Wednesday, November 2, 2022
Problem with this page?

Participants:

Profiles Mentioned:

Related Projects:

Showing 1-30 of 32 posts

Especially tagging Ric Dickinson, Geni Curator Also Sharon Doubell who curates Élisabeth de Courtenay



From https://groups.google.com/g/soc.genealogy.medieval/c/psv2U0Vkd-s/m/... Nov 6 2019

Dear Newsgroup ~

Below is my current file account of Reynold de Courtenay (died c.1191). This man was obviously from a good background, as he served as witness for numerous charters of King Henry II issued in the period, 1164–1188.

Complete Peerage 4 (1916): 317 (sub Devon) (ped.) alleges without evidence that Renaud de Courtenay, seigneur of Courtenay, living 1149, is the same person as the later individual Reynold de Courtenay, died 1190–1, of Sutton, Berkshire and Waddesdon, Buckinghamshire.

Charles Cawley of Medlands adopts the view that the two men were the same person. Mr. Cawley refers us to Burke’s Peerage which states that Louis VII, King of France quarrelled with Renaud de Courtenay, seigneur of Courtenay, while on the Second Crusade, confiscated his French possessions, and bestowed them on his younger brother Pierre whom he married to Renaud’s daughter Elisabeth. This would presumably explain why the French Renaud subsequently surfaced in the train of the English king. Cawley admits, however, "it has not been possible to trace primary sources which justify all these statements." No primary sources = red flag.

When asked by me to provide additional evidence that the two men were the same person, Mr. Cawley has been unable to do so. It is certainly common in the medieval period for two men to have the same name. This is no surprise. It is insufficient evidence, however, to presume that two men with the same name are the same person.

I accept that there was a connection between the French and English Courtenay families. Complete Peerage 4 (1916): 465, footnote b indicates that the arms of the Courtenays, both English and French, were, Or, three roundlets Gules (with various brisures). These were borne (seals, 1205, 1212) by Pierre, Sire de Courtenay, Count of Nevers, Auxerre, and Tonnerre, s. and h. of Pierre de France, citing Du Bouchet, Maison de Courtenay (1661): 89–99, preuves, 13–15. I haven't reviewed this evidence but I have no reason to doubt it.

At the present time, however, I remain unconvinced that Renaud de Courtenay, seigneur of Courtenay, living 1149, is the same person as Reynold de Courtenay, of England, died c.1191.

Best always, Douglas Richardson, Historian and Genealogist


REYNOLD DE COURTENAY (or CURTENAY, CORTENAY), of Sutton, Berkshire, and Waddesdon, Buckinghamshire, and, in right of his 2nd wife, of Okehampton and Musbury, Devon, Hemington, Somerset, etc., of uncertain parentage. He married (1st) an unidentified wife, _____, kinswoman of Queen Eleanor of Aquitaine (wife of King Henry II of England). They had three sons, William, Robert, and Reynold, and one daughter, Egeline. He was a witness in 1150 at Rouen in Normandy of a charter of Henry, Duke of Normandy (afterwards King Henry II of England). He held lands in Sutton, Berkshire in 1160–1, and received a grant of the manor from King Henry II sometime in the period, 1175–84. He witnessed numerous charters of King Henry II issued in the period, 1164–88. He was frequently in the king’s train on his itineraries in England and France. In 1171 he accompanied the king in his campaign in Ireland. He married (2nd) after 1173 MAUD FITZ ROBERT, daughter of Robert Fitz Roy (illegitimate son of King Henry I of England), by Maud, daughter of Robert d’Avranches [see ENGLAND 2.i for her ancestry]. In 1174 he witnessed an agreement between King Henry II and William the Lion, King of Scots. He was first recorded as holding lands in Devon in 1175–6. Sometime prior to his death, he granted two islands in the Thames between Witteneiam [?Wittenham] and Wadeiam [?Waddeson] to Abingdon Abbey. REYNOLD DE COURTENAY was living Michaelmas 1190, and died before Michaelmas 1191. In 1200 William de Préaux made fine with the king to have the wife of Reynold de Curtenay with his land; Maud allegedly went abroad to evade this marriage. In 1204–5 the king presented to the chapel of Musbury, Devon, which should have been in his widow, Maud’s gift. In 1213 Maud obtained letters of safe conduct permitting her to return to England and petition for the king’s favor. In 1215 the king directed the Constable of Wallingford to deliver to her seisin of the vill of Waddesdon, Buckinghamshire, which formed part of her dower. She presented to the church of Waddesdon, Buckinghamshire about 1215. In 1220 she sued the Prior of Burcester regarding her dower lands in Waddesdon, Buckinghamshire. The same year In 1220 she sued Robert de Courtenay and Reynold de Courtenay (her nephews and step-grandsons) for the manors of Oakhampton, Chawleigh, Chulmleigh, Kenn, and Musbury, and Sampford, Devon and Hemington, Somerset, which she claimed as her right; Robert answered that no claims under French titles were valid; Maud rebutted that the properties were in England and she was English. Maud died shortly before 3 August 1224. In 1227 a mandate was sent to the sheriff of Gloucestershire ordering him to make enquiry of Peter Fitz Herbert concerning scutage for the manor of Okehampton, Devon which belonged to Maud de Courtenay.

References

Pole, Colls. towards a Desc. of Devon (1791): 2–5 (charter of Maud de Courtenay, lady of Oakhampton; another charter of Reynold de Courtenay granted with consent of Maud his wife). Kennett, Parochial Antiqs. of Ambrosden, Burcester 1 (1818): 277. Coll. Top. et Gen. 1 (1834): 184, 189 (“List of charters in the cartulary of St. Nicholas Priory, Exeter: Coll. Top. et Gen. 1 (1834): 189 (undated charter of Reynold de Courtenay and his wife, Maud; charter witnessed by William and Robert de Courtenay). Hardy, Rotuli Normanniae in Turri Londinensi Asservati (1835): 40. Dugdale, Monasticon Anglicanum 5 (1846): 377–382 (Ford Abbey, Fundationis et Fundatorum Historia: “Fuit autem iste dictus Reginaldus de Courtney filius domini Flori, filii regis Franciae Ludovici, cognomento Grossi; ac etiam ista Hawisia vicecomitissa uxor ejus secunda, de sanguine regio Anglicano, ex parte dominae Albredae neptis etiam regis Willielmi Bastardi matris aviae suae dominae Adeliciae vicecomitissae primitus memoratae generosae exorta.”). Collectanea Archæologica 1 (1862): 263–284. Bain, Cal. of Docs. rel. to Scotland 2 (1884): 15 (Robert de Courtenay [son of Reynold] styled “kinsman” [cognatus] of Queem Eleanor of Aquitaine). Maitland, Bracton’s Note Book 2 (1887): 133–134, 137–138; 3 (1887): 355–356, 450–452. Notes & Queries 6th Ser. 3 (1881): 1–3; 7th Ser. 4 (1887): 430; 8th Ser. 7 (1895): 441–443. Note-book of Tristram Risdon (1897): 53–56. Round, Cal. Docs. Preserved in France 1 (1899): 316–317. Phillimore, Rotuli Hugonis de Welles Episcopi Lincolniensis 1209–1235 2 (Canterbury & York Soc. 3) (1907): 49. C.P. 4 (1916): 465, footnote b (Courtenay in Gâtinais. The arms of the Courtenays, both English and French, were, Or, three roundlets Gules (with various brisures). These were borne (seals, 1205, 1212) by Pierre, Sire de Courtenay, Count of Nevers, Auxerre, and Tonnerre, s. and h. of Pierre de France, citing Du Bouchet, Maison de Courtenay (1661): 89–99, preuves, 13–15). C.P. 4 (1916): 317 (sub Devon) (ped.) (author alleges without evidence that Renaud de Courtenay, seigneur of Courtenay, living 1149, is the same person as Reynold de Courtenay, died 1190–1, of Sutton, Berkshire). Stenton, Great Roll of the Pipe Michaelmas 1190 (Pubs. Pipe Roll Soc. n.s. 1) (1925): 31. Stenton, Great Rolls of the Pipe Michaelmas 1191 & Michaelmas 1192 (Pubs. Pipe Roll Soc. n.s. 2) (1926): 162, 276. Curia Regis Rolls, 8 (1938): 32, 213; 9 (1952): 36–37, 71–72, 293–294; 10 (1949): 22, 53. Curia Regis Rolls 9 (1952): 36–37. Seversmith, Colonial Fams. of Long Island, New York & Connecticut 5 (1958): 2419–2424. Darlington, Cartulary of Worcester Cathedral Priory (Pipe Roll Soc. n.s. 38) (1968): 132–133. Keefe, Feudal Assessments & the Political Community under Henry II & his Sons (1983): 104, 109. Schwennicke, Europäische Stanmtafeln 3(2) (1983): 354 (illegitimate children of King Henry I of England); 3(4) (1989): 629. Traditio 41 (1985): 145–179 (author suggests that Reynold de Courtenay above is possibly the “Renaud” or “Renaud Pauper” who witnessed charters dated 1152 and 1155 as “cognatus” [kinsman] for Robert, Count of Dreux, younger son of King Louis VI of France). Kemp, Reading Abbey Cartularies 1 (Camden 4th Ser. 31) (1986): 232; 2 (Camden 4th Ser. 33) (1987): 232–233. Schwennicke, Europäische Stanmtafeln 3(2) (1983): 354 (illegitimate children of King Henry I of England); 3(4) (1989): 629. Slade & Lambrick, Two Cartularies of Abingdon Abbey 1 (Oxford Hist. Soc. n.s. 32) (1990): 170–171 (charter of Reynold de Courtenay dated pre-1194). Hanna, Christchurch Priory Cartulary (Hampshire Rec. Ser. 18) (2007): 281 (charter of Maud de Courtenay dated before 1224).
Hanna Christchurch Priory Cartulary (2007): 281. Cornwall Rec. Office: Arundell of Lanherne and Trerice, AR/1/557 (no date [12th century?]; in his court at Cuwyk [Cowick]. Confirmation by Reginald de Courtenay, for the souls of himself and Maud his wife, and of his children and parents, of the gift by Osbert [sic, for Osbern] de Hyduna and Geoffrey his brother, and later by Richard de Hydona and John his son, to the church and canons of Tanton, of the land of Middelduna, as freely as attested by charters of Robert son of King Henry and of John de Hydona; also of a ferling of Madecombe which John de Hydona gave, and of the land of Sinderhull which Agnes daughter of the said Osbert gave; Witnesses: Robert de Courtenay and William his brother, William Dapifer, Henry the chaplain, William de Punchard[un], Guy de Bryan, Anthony de la Bruer', Henry his brother, Richard Ottele [?], 'Hatelinus' de Hydona, William de Hemiok, Henry Hostiar', Simon Delpyt, Roger his brother, Walter Pipinus, Richard son of Brian, Brian his brother, William Talebot, Richard his son, Richard de Hydona, Arnold de Burdeuyle, Robert Anechorus Cophinus (available at http://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.ukhttp://www.a2a.org.uk/searc...). Devon Rec. Office: Petre, 123M/TB281 (grant dated late 12th c. in fee farm with warranty Matilda de Curtenai lady of Oke [Okehampton] to Ailmar de Siete. Mill of Misbire [Musbury], which was at farm for 18s. annually, to hold at fee farm by hereditary right to Ailmar from Matilda. Rent 20s. Consideration Ailmar’s homage and service --- a certain gold ring and 100s. which Ailmar gave to Matilda in her court of Cuwic [Cowick, St. Thomas’s Exeter] in aid of her --- her relief and fine made to the king. Matilda should warrant the mill for 20s. with all mulcture, land, meadow, pasture, common.) (available at http://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk). National Archives, DL 34/1/34 (Writ of H[ubert] de Burgh, justiciar, to Hugh de Neville requesting him to restrain the bailiffs of Brill forest from exacting unjust services from Maud de Courtenay and from her manor of Waddesdon, Bucks. Date: 1215–1224) (available at http://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.ukhttp:// www.catalogue.nationalarchives.gov.uk/search.asp). Devon Rec. Office: Petre, 123M/TB281 (grant dated late 12th c. in fee farm with warranty Matilda de Curtenai lady of Oke [Okehampton] to Ailmar de Siete. Mill of Misbire [Musbury], which was at farm for 18s. annually, to hold at fee farm by hereditary right to Ailmar from Matilda. Rent 20s. Consideration Ailmar’s homage and service --- a certain gold ring and 100s. which Ailmar gave to Matilda in her court of Cuwic [Cowick, St. Thomas’s Exeter] in aid of her --- her relief and fine made to the king. Matilda should warrant the mill for 20s. with all mulcture, land, meadow, pasture, common.) (available at http://www.a2a.org.uk/search/index.asp).

——

Apparently updated at Wikitree.

To make it a bit simpler.

The more current thinking is that there were two Renalds - French & English (although the man who held English property likely was born in France).

Wikitree has separated the two lines.

If there is agreement, I suggest Geni do the same. The more notable line is the person who is (mostly) the profile

Renauld de Courtenay, Seigneur de Courtenay (Renauld de Courtenay, Seigneur de Courtenay)

Wow, Erica, thanks for the Thesis. I wish I had more knowledge on the subject to be helpful. Look forward to hearing what the resolve is. I am a direct ancestor of Renauld de Courtenay.

But which one?

Name the kid - because they’ll be moving around.

Thanks for doing this, Erica. Yell where I can help specifically - I'm supposed to be marking.

I have direct lines from Renaud II & Elisabeth; so, how will this affect my tree?
Thanks!

Every time they change will affect our trees. Linda Wellman

I am here at Geni to cherish/honor my Ancestors. Not to see trees falling because "A wants to show that knows better than B".

(Repost for better relevance)

Draft of what the proposed changes would affect.

This is based on Richardson (2019):

REYNOLD DE COURTENAY (or CURTENAY, CORTENAY), of Sutton, Berkshire, and Waddesdon, Buckinghamshire, and, in right of his 2nd wife, of Okehampton and Musbury, Devon, Hemington, Somerset, etc., of uncertain parentage. He married (1st) an unidentified wife, _____, kinswoman of Queen Eleanor of Aquitaine (wife of King Henry II of England). They had three sons, William, Robert, and Reynold, and one daughter, Egeline. … He married (2nd) after 1173 MAUD FITZ ROBERT, daughter of Robert Fitz Roy (illegitimate son of King Henry I of England), by Maud, daughter of Robert d’Avranches. …

Here’s more about daughter Elizabeth (of French Renaud)

Peter Stewart explained in post at SGM, 27 January 2003 < GoogleGroups > “Parents of Elisabeth de Courtenay”

The following account of the first Courtenay family's last generations was given, largely from earlier secondary sources, in _Histoire généalogique et chronologique de la Maison royale de France..._ by Père Anselme (Pierre de Guibours) & others, third edition, 9 vols (Paris, 1726-33), vol I pp 474 and 527-8:

1 Miles, seigneur de Courtenay, died after 1127 [NB actually in or after 1138 when he last occurs], married ca 1095 Ermengarde de Nevers

2 (their third son) Renaud, seigneur de Courtenay, allegedly married an unnamed sister of Guy du Donjon [who is stated wrongly to have been living in 1148], also described as daughter of Frederic, seigneur du Donjon

3a Elisabeth, died 14 September in or after 1205, married Pierre de France (ancestors of the second French Courtenay line)
3b Unnamed daughter, died sp, married Avalon, seigneur de Saillenay

CP vol IV p 317 (table) states that Renaud (#2) lost his lands in France & held Sutton, Berkshire in 1161. He is given a second marriage, to Maud, dame du Sap, said to be childless. This version omits #3b above and adds instead:

3c Renaud de Courtenay, died 27 September 1194, married Hawise de Curcy, lady of Okehampton (ancestors of the English Courtenays)

With minor variations this has become the standard genealogy in English works since. In _Colonial Families of Long Island, New York and Connecticut_, vol 5 (Chevy Chase, Maryland, 1958) Herbert Furman Seversmith argued against the undocumented link shown in CP - but not in Père Anselme - between the French & English families, for reasons that were summarised by William Addams Reitwiesner in a posting of 23 May 2002, as follows:

"Seversmith's argument that the English Reginald de Courtenay was not the same person as the French Reginald de Courtenay appears on p. 2423, and consists of four parts. First is the chronology, as the English Reginald was born about 1125, while the French Reginald's parents were married around 1095. Second is their personal characters, the French Reginald being a

glorified bandit while the English Reginald escaped the notice of any chroniclers, and is known only through charters. Third is their social status, the French Reginald being a nephew of the Count of Odessa and having a daughter who married a son of the King of France (who took her name of Courtenay), while the English Reginald was only the lord of a not very large manor, not a baron, and not even a knight. The fourth is that there is no actual evidence to support the suggestion that they were the same person -- the connection was made by Cleaveland in his 1735 Courtenay genealogy and has been repeated uncritically ever since." ….

(Then there’s more about alternate identifications for Elizabeth’s mother, which I will leave to Sharon and others to discuss as need be. But this reminds that profile Adelvia ‘Helvide’ de Courtenay stays with French Renauld, and that his biography should reflect that he had two daughters.)



I’ve started the profiles for Renauld ‘Reynold l’ de Courtenay & 1st wife de Courtenay Anyone is welcome to request management.

Here’s more about the French vs English branches. Google translate from French, “ Elisabeth de Montlhéry and her descendants (2)” (February 2012)
< link >

The Courtenays of England

The Courtenay family split into two branches: French and English when Renaud de Courtenay, son of Milon fled to England following his quarrel with King Louis VII the younger, provoked by the infidelities of Queen Eleanor.

• In France, his daughter Elisabeth was married to Pierre de France, the king's brother, who received the lands abandoned by Renaud. This branch died out in 1730.

• In France, his son Renaud married Hawise de Courcy, whose son Robert (died in 1242) became Baron of Okehampton inherited from his mother Hawise de Courcy (1135-1209). He married Mary de Redvers, daughter of William de Redvers, Earl of Devon. From which came John (d. 1274) then Hugh de Courtenay (d. 1292). [this identification needs to be further checked]

It is very difficult to disentangle the true history of the English branch of Courtenay. Over time, various versions have appeared, but all agree in giving a certain Renaud as the head of the Courtenay-England house. Who was he ? Did the character flee France because of his quarrel with the king who reproached him for having favored the infidelity of Queen Eleanor? Here are different interpretations by ancient historians: …

Genealogists agree on the name of the 3rd Sieur de Courtenay of England in the person of Robert, Lord of Okehampton, husband of Mary de Vernon, daughter and sole heiress of William Earl of Devon from whom Jean (John) de Courtenay. Robert is quoted in an old charter where he names his grandfather Renaud.


The original page in French is https://vieux-marcoussis.pagesperso-orange.fr/Chroniques/elisabeth2...

Please bite the 2012 date!

Thank you, Erica Howton!

I’ve moved over the English children from (French) Courtenays to Renauld ‘Reynold l’ de Courtenay & also disconnected Maud fitzRobert, Dame du Sap from the French side.

If anyone can persuade us differently, they can be reverted.

Apparently the main interest however is with the more royal side - Élisabeth de Courtenay - and there’s a separate discussion in regards to her mother.

See https://www.geni.com/discussions/256732?msg=1595886

1.Renauld de Courtenay, Seigneur de Courtenay is your fifth cousin 21 times removed.
You
→ Elza Dzelvite (Grahpe,Grāpe)
your mother → Jahn Grahpe
her father → Baron Arnold Julius von Vietinghoff-Riesch
his father → Juliane Charlotte Lulla von Vietinghoff
his mother → Helene Gertrude von Krüdener
her mother → Gustav Georg von Völckersahm
her father → Sophia Elisabeth von Mengden
his mother → ObtLt., Frhr Magnus Gustav von Mengden, von Altenwoga
her father → Gustav v. Mengden Frhr. v. Altenwoga
his father → Gertrud von Mengden Frfr. von Altenwoga
his mother → Jürgen von Rosen
her father → Kersten von Rosen
his father → Kersten III von Rosen auf Hochenrosen
his father → Jürgen l von Rosen
his father → N.N. von Tiesenhausen
his mother → Bartholomeus von Tiesenhausen, of Kokenhausen
her father → Johann von Tiesenhausen
his father → Princess Sofia von Hoya, a Princess of Polotsk and Countess of Hoya
his mother → Bernardus von Hoya
her father → Graf von Hoya Heinrich von Stumpenhusen
his father → Christine von Oldenburg
his mother → Salome van Gelre-Zutphen
her mother → Gerhard II, count of Guelders
her father → Clémence d'Aquitaine
his mother → Pierre Guillaume 'l'Aigret' ou 'le Hardi' d'Aquitaine, VII Duc d'Aquitaine, V Comte de Poitou
her father → Agnes of Burgundy
his mother → Mathilde de Nevers, dame de Limais
her sister → Renaud I, comte de Nevers
her son → Guillaume I, comte de Nevers
his son → Renaud II, comte de Nevers
his son → Ermengarde de Nevers
his daughter → Renauld de Courtenay, Seigneur de Courtenay
her son
2.Violante de Hungría, reina consorte de Aragón is your 21st great aunt.
3.Élisabeth de Courtenay is your 6th cousin 20 times removed.
4.William de Courtenay is your first cousin 25 times removed's husband's son.
5.Robert de Courtenay, lord of Sutton is your second cousin 25 times removed's husband
6.Maud fitzRobert, Dame du Sap is your 6th cousin 17 times removed.
7.Helvide ‘Hawise’ du Donjon, Dame d'Yerres is your 28th great grandmother's husband's daughter.
8.Reynold Il de Courtenay is your 23rd great grandmother's ex-husband's third cousin's 1st husband.
9.Adelvia ‘Helvide’ de Courtenay is your 6th cousin 20 times removed.
10.Reynold l de Courtenay, 1st lord of Sutton is your 20th great grandmother's husband's second cousin once removed's husband.
11.1st wife of Reynold de Courtenay is your first cousin 25 times removed's husband's 1st wife.

It is an interesting conundrum.

Cawley makes a good point that the so called "English" family did not just come out of thin air. He presents more valid points supporting the concept that the 2 Renauds were the same man, than those supporting separation.

But Richardson is compelling in pointing out errors in Cawley's presentation, as well as other factors.

The age differences between Renaud, Seigneur de Courtenay and Renaud II, father of Robert is possible, but not ideal, and the same can be said as to Helvise. My best conjecture is that the two lines are definitely related but not via Renaud I, and perhaps further research will reveal the parentage of Reynold, 1st Lord of Sutton.

But at this time I think Erica Howton has the right idea.

Thank you, I was hoping you’d take a look, Steven Mitchell Ferry And - we’re further along in sourcing out the English family than Wikitree, which gives me a sense of satisfaction. :)

I had stumbled on this from Gervase de Courtenay who also seems related, but so far, don’t see how.

I show this Reynold de Courtenay as 27th gg through daughter Egelina de Courtenay to American Colonist, Elizabeth Lathrop (9th gg); who, in turn, shows as ancestor to Franklin D. Roosevelt, 32nd President of the USA.

The English line should be checked.

https://www.geni.com/path/Erica-Howton+is+related+to+Reynold-l-de-Courtenay-1st-lord-of-Sutton?from=363677820350011581&path_type=blood&to=6000000188589299896

And that broke already. William Leigh Was not the son of Catherine Leigh

New path: https://www.geni.com/path/Steven-Ferry+is+related+to+Reynold-l-de-Courtenay-1st-lord-of-Sutton?from=6000000040363953660&path_type=blood&to=6000000188589299896

Settler Ens. Benjamin Cooley

With a comment:

Important to note the following with respect to extensive research on the origins of Benjamin Cooley:

http://cooleyfamilyassociation.com/the-old-word-origin-of-immigrant...

Erica Howton Actually, my connection is via the Halls, with John Hall III being a son of Elizabeth Brune, daughter of Elizabeth Martin of Athelhampton. Then Daubeneys thru to Sir Ralph of 1304, his wife Alice de Montagu, her mother Elizabeth Montfort, her mother Matilda de le Mare

Matilda was daughter to Joan Neville, who was daughter to Hawise de Courtenay. I usually don't rely soley on what Geni presents, as we have so many undocumented links between New Worlders and Old.

There were some 20,000 immigrants to New England (1620-1640) with documented origins (or known to be not known) so we should be able to resolve most of those. And projects like this are useful for many more.

I think Renaud & Reynold are one in the same.

And as for Maud being the daughter of a Henry I bastard, an error here probably doesn't affect many folks since Henry I's "royal seed" is all over the place, and even if this connection is improper, there are plenty others.. :)

I've got lots of bastards in my tree, the closest being Pierre Bourbon-Busset "The Great Bastard".

Yoda of Dagobah

Re: I think Renaud & Reynold are one in the same.

What supports your opinion?

Too many coincidences.

Not enough details, you mean. :)

Cawley's take on it:
The most difficult problem associated with Renaud de Courtenay, shown below, is deciding whether Renaud Seigneur de Courtenay, son of Milon Seigneur de Courtenay, who is recorded in French sources until 1149 (“French Renaud”) was the same person as Renaud de Courtenay who is recorded in England between [1160/61] and 1194 (“English Renaud”).

Several factors favour this co-identity:

· Similar ages. The birth of French Renaud’s mother can be dated to a few years before 1085, when her own mother is named with her presumed second husband or, if that second marriage is incorrect (the possibility of which is discussed further in BURGUNDY DUCHY NOBILITY-NEVERS), when she must have been deceased. French Renaud was her third known son, therefore was probably born in [1105/20]. The birth of French Renaud’s daughter Elisabeth, dated to [1140/45], suggests that he was probably born in the later part of that range. The birth of Guillaume, first son of English Renaud, can also be dated to [1140/45] which suggests that his father was probably born around the same time as French Renaud. English Renaud’s death is dated to 1194 which, if the suggested birth date ranges are correct, would not be inconsistent with the birth of French Renaud in, say, [1112/20].

· No overlap. French Renaud is last recorded in France in 1149. English Renaud is first recorded in England in [1160/61]. The chronology of the births of the children of French Renaud and English Renaud also appears to match, especially considering that one source states that English Renaud’s first son Guillaume was born to his father’s first wife who, from a chronological point of view, could have been the same person as French Renaud’s known wife. A potential difficulty with this argument is an apparent reference to French Renaud’s wife in 1155, although this mention has not been verified as correct.

· No other obvious parentage for English Renaud. No reference to the Courtenay family in England has been found before [1160/61], for example in the 1129 Pipe Roll and or in the charters of Kings Henry I and Stephen which are reproduced in the Regesta Regum Anglorum series. It is a safe assumption that English Renaud arrived in England from France shortly before [1160/61] and that he was related to the French Courtenay family. From a chronological point of view, English Renaud could have been the son of one of Milon de Courtenay’s younger brothers. The eldest known brother Joscelin can probably be dismissed, as his known descendants are described fully in crusader sources. Of the other two known brothers, no record has been found of their having married and having had children.

· English Renaud’s daughter. She is named “filie Regin de Crtinni” in London/Middlesex in the [1166/67] Pipe Roll, when she must have been of age. No reference has been found to her marriage or descendants, or indeed to any other daughter of English Renaud. It is possible that she was the same person as Elisabeth, daughter of French Renaud and married to Pierre de France, who held some interest in England at that time through her father.

· “Guillaume de Courtenay” in France in 1160. “Willelmus de Cortiniaco...”, signing first in the subscription list, witnessed the charter dated 24 Nov 1160 under which “Petrus dominus Curtiniaci et uxor mea Elisabeth” confirmed donations made by “antecessorum nostrorum...dominus Milo et filii eius” to Fontaine-Jean abbey[140]. It is unlikely that the witness was Guillaume de Courtenay, older brother of Milon de Courtenay, who most likely died during the 1147 Second Crusade. In addition, the body of the document refers to “dominus Milo et filii eius”: if the witness had been one of Milon’s sons, the fact would probably have been mentioned. The only other known Guillaume de Courtenay at the time was the oldest son of English Renaud, whose existence is confirmed (as well as his death before that date) by the 1194 Pipe Roll entry which is quoted below. If Guillaume, son of English Renaud, was born during the early part of the date range [1140/45] (see above), he would recently have come of age in 1160. If his father was French Renaud, he would have been the senior male representative of the previous Courtenay dynasty apart from French Renaud himself (assuming, for this part of the discussion, that he was still alive). In that case, the donors may have considered it prudent to involve him in the confirmation to avoid future challenges. Guillaume de Courtenay is named in a second charter: “Petrus de Curtiniaco frater regis” confirmed donations made to Fontaine-Jean abbey by “Guillelmus de Curtiniaco” on leaving for Jerusalem, with the consent of “uxoris mei Elisabeth”, by undated charter[141]. Again, it is unlikely that this document refers to Milon’s son Guillaume, who is known to have left for Jerusalem on the Second Crusade, as ex post facto confirmation of his donations at that time would have been unnecessary especially as the 1160 document confirmed all donations which he would have made (“dominus Milo et filii eius”). If that is correct, it is likely that the donor Guillaume was the same person who witnessed the 1160 charter and therefore also possibly the son of English Renaud.

· English Renaud’s status in England. English Renaud and his family are recorded with landholdings in Buckinghamshire/Bedfordshire, Kent, Devon, Dorset/Somerset, and Northamptonshire, as well as Sutton in Berkshire, in Pipe Rolls during the reign of King Henry II. English Renaud is also recorded as the guardian of the minor Walter de Bolebec in the 1160s. The wives of his sons Guillaume and Robert belonged to prominent families. All these factors indicate that English Renaud held a certain amount of status in the land-holding class in England, consistent with a prominent family origin.

· The alleged confiscation of French Renaud’s assets in France. Modern secondary sources state that French Renaud quarrelled with the French king who confiscated his assets and awarded them to his brother Pierre de France on marrying French Renaud’s daughter Elisabeth. They also state that French Renaud left for England where he was granted Sutton in Berkshire by King Henry II. No primary sources have been identified which confirm all these statements. Documents dated to 1149 confirm a dispute between French Renaud and the French king. The delay before English Renaud’s first appearance in [1160/61] suggests that this may not have been the dispute which triggered the supposed confiscation, if the story is true. Taken with all the other indications, a serious dispute followed by confiscation provides the best explanation for the changes in fortune of the Courtenay family in the mid-12th century, even though there is no proof.

Some factors which do not support the supposed co-identity are:

· The Continuator of Aimon of Fleury. This source records that Pierre de France received the lands of [French] Renaud on marrying his daughter, adding that “quia non erat alius hæres superstes” (“as there was no other surviving heir”)[142]. The Continuator does not state explicitly that French Renaud had died, although this seems to be implied by the wording of the relevant paragraph. The story told by the Continuator appears straightforward, with no hint of a dispute or of confiscation of property, until the other factors listed above are considered. If the Continuator can be dated to [1200], it is possible that the existence of French Renaud’s disinherited sons may have been long forgotten by then, especially if they had settled in England and cut ties with France.

· Onomastics. The names Milon and Joscelin, typical of the French Courtenay family, are not found among English Renaud’s known descendants, although the existence of only a limited number of his descendants can be confirmed by primary source material.

· The Fundationis et Fundatorum Historia of Ford Abbey. This source names “domini Flori filii regis Franciæ Lodovici cognomento Grossi” as the father of English Renaud[143]. There is no record of the existence of such a person and, assuming that “filii” was an error for “fratris”, no other evidence that Fleuri, son of Philippe I King of France (see FRANCE CAPETIAN KINGS), had any connection with the Courtenay family. The Historia includes many pieces of information which are disproved by other primary sources or are otherwise unreliable.

On balance, taking all these factors into consideration, the existence of a single Renaud de Courtenay, to whom all the sources quoted below refer, seems likely. It also results in a reconstruction of his family which is consistent with all sources so far identified and appears to be credible as shown below. https://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/chamsensjoi.htm#Elisabethdiedafter...

Douglas Richardson's take on it:

Dear Newsgroup ~

Below is my current file account of Reynold de Courtenay (died c.1191). This man was obviously from a good background, as he served as witness for numerous charters of King Henry II issued in the period, 1164–1188.

Complete Peerage 4 (1916): 317 (sub Devon) (ped.) alleges without evidence that Renaud de Courtenay, seigneur of Courtenay, living 1149, is the same person as the later individual Reynold de Courtenay, died 1190–1, of Sutton, Berkshire and Waddesdon, Buckinghamshire.

Charles Cawley of Medlands adopts the view that the two men were the same person. Mr. Cawley refers us to Burke’s Peerage which states that Louis VII, King of France quarrelled with Renaud de Courtenay, seigneur of Courtenay, while on the Second Crusade, confiscated his French possessions, and bestowed them on his younger brother Pierre whom he married to Renaud’s daughter Elisabeth. This would presumably explain why the French Renaud subsequently surfaced in the train of the English king. Cawley admits, however, "it has not been possible to trace primary sources which justify all these statements." No primary sources = red flag.

When asked by me to provide additional evidence that the two men were the same person, Mr. Cawley has been unable to do so. It is certainly common in the medieval period for two men to have the same name. This is no surprise. It is insufficient evidence, however, to presume that two men with the same name are the same person.

I accept that there was a connection between the French and English Courtenay families. Complete Peerage 4 (1916): 465, footnote b indicates that the arms of the Courtenays, both English and French, were, Or, three roundlets Gules (with various brisures). These were borne (seals, 1205, 1212) by Pierre, Sire de Courtenay, Count of Nevers, Auxerre, and Tonnerre, s. and h. of Pierre de France, citing Du Bouchet, Maison de Courtenay (1661): 89–99, preuves, 13–15. I haven't reviewed this evidence but I have no reason to doubt it.

At the present time, however, I remain unconvinced that Renaud de Courtenay, seigneur of Courtenay, living 1149, is the same person as Reynold de Courtenay, of England, died c.1191.

Best always, Douglas Richardson, Historian and Genealogist From https://groups.google.com/g/soc.genealogy.medieval/c/psv2U0Vkd-s/m/... Nov 6 2019

Showing 1-30 of 32 posts

Create a free account or login to participate in this discussion