Vally Petrea Holm Andersen (Pedersdatter) - not a discussion but notes Ved registrering eller notarialtransaksjon er det ingen garanti eller godkjenning av innholdet i et dokument.

Never use 1923 as a rule to make a -daughter name. Only sources for it count.
Never use 1923 as a rule for fabrication.

Hi cousin Bjørn - Yes, thank you. I noticed that native English speakers in the United States without foreign language experience are not aware of the patronymic system used by many countries. Native English ​​tend to believe that any name with a different spelling cannot be related. Worse are those who learn "datter" is for all Nordic women, and "sen" is for men.

The message I posted was aimed at those who approach genealogical taxonomy as a consistently ancient method of hierarchical name classification. My comment was rudimentary and outdated for the experienced researchers. Nevertheless, I hoped to help individual speakers explain names and culture more flexibly. Everything we record should include people, families, communities, representations, data, and most importantly, the big picture. Family surname taxonomy demonstrates how genealogy is related to many other existing disciplines in history, language, mass psychology, and human behavior.

That's wrong, but as you said, let's not "fabricate" inaccurate and partial information or just enter the names of the family trees. We must all make an effort to examine a family member before adding or changing information because copying, pasting, merging can duplicate errors exponentially.

The introductory English-speaking genealogist does not know Old Norse, Danish, Swedish, Finnish, Baltic, Icelandic, Greenlandic or Dutch customs. Nevertheless, they have enough computer knowledge and basic family knowledge to create genealogical inconsistencies, tangled knots, false documents, mergers, and generational discrepancies. Fortunately, many Nordic relatives are family veterans and are multilingual. We depend on relatives like you to help and welcome the newest members.

Bjørn P. Brox is your fourth cousin's partner's third cousin when it's removed.

Philip Tufi
→ Grace Marie Tufi
your mother → Emil Andrew Clausen
her father → Karen Marie Clausen
his mother → Johannes Mathisen
her father → Elen Mathisdatter
his sister → Karoline Olsdatter Thomassen
her daughter → Eliva Mathilde Edvardsen
her daughter → Steinar Edvardsen
her son → Kristin Edvardsen
his daughter → Øystein Gjerde
her partner → <private> Gjerde (Johansen)
his mother → Hagbart Edvin Brox
her foster father → Mette Jensine Brox
his mother → Rasmus Johan Brox
her father → Hans Hagerup Brox
his brother → Rudolf Johan Brox
his son → Trygve Andreas Brox
his son → Bjørn P. Brox

) Thank you ---- yes, exactly my point is that you know details about behaviors and traditions that we could never find in digital copies of things. YES, and the smart matches have become an editing project to separate the cheese from the omelette and mix the scrambled eggs into yolk and egg whites.

I also try to anticipate that some agencies like US immigration that enter immigration information will seem neat and tidy. They were in a crowded, chaotic ship environment, and somehow the scripture looks as if they were sitting and writing everything down in one setting. Those who collect the data are likely to collect the data during the immigration process and then spend another day filling out the paperwork from the first copy. Maybe they use notes to keep the general ledger clean and consistent. Other workers may transcribe the notes to the documents and print them by hand from a copy of other people's records, may end up being guessed by the registrar. Where the names are unknown to the officer, girls are incorrectly listed as men, alphabets may vary, letters may be incorrectly copied. That record is then published 100 years later digitally and used by our other genealogists as documented registration certificates.

how is this translation?

) Takk ---- ja, akkurat poenget mitt er at du vet detaljer om atferd og tradisjoner som vi aldri kunne finne i digitale kopier av ting. JA, og de smarte fyrstikkene har blitt et redigeringsprosjekt for å skille osten fra omeletten og blande eggerøra til eggeplomme og eggehviter.

Jeg prøver også å forutse at noen byråer som amerikansk immigrasjon som legger inn immigrasjonsinformasjon vil virke ryddige og ryddige. De var i et overfylt, kaotisk skipsmiljø, og på en eller annen måte ser skriften ut som om de satt og skrev ned alt i én setting. De som samler inn dataene vil sannsynligvis samle inn dataene under immigrasjonsprosessen og deretter bruke enda en dag på å fylle ut papirene fra den første kopien. Kanskje de bruker notater for å holde hovedboken ren og konsekvent. Andre arbeidere kan transkribere notatene til dokumentene og skrive dem ut for hånd fra en kopi av andres registre, kan ende opp med å bli gjettet av registraren. Der navnene er ukjente for offiseren, er jenter feil oppført som menn, alfabeter kan variere, bokstaver kan være feil kopiert. Den posten blir så publisert 100 år senere digitalt og brukt av våre andre slektsforskere som dokumenterte registreringsbevis.

matches - har du fyrstikker til sigaretten min - fyrstikker tenn en fyrstikk og kopier ordrett
matches - ordrett not fire stick...lol

ord for ord