Amy Wolff, my point is a simple (and, I think, obvious) one: Rabbi Baeck was in NO sense a refugee or an emigré from the German Reich. Terezín was within the German Reich, and even if it had not been so, to be forcibly interred in a concentration camp or a ghetto under German control is not to emigrate or find refuge. To dismiss this incontestable fact as a matter of "semantics" is utterly disingenuous.
Ralph Michael Silverman, in light of Amy Wolff's reply, your point seems to me legitimate, though it is disappointing to me. I thought that this group was intended to live up to its name, but the reply of Amy Wolff indicates that it does not do so and therefore is of no value.
Private User Thank you for making an important observation. However, Rabbi Leo Baeck's supreme dedication to helping Reich Refugees escape intimately connects him with them. ie.
https://www.jmberlin.de/en/topic-leo-baeck
Despite countless appeals and opportunities, Baeck refused to escape into exile. He helped others to leave Germany, but he himself remained to represent those who had no way of escaping. In 1945, after it was liberated, he moved to London, where his daughter had already been living since 1938.
The Council of Jews from Germany appointed Baeck as its president. This union strove for the representation of Jews who had fled Germany to different countries, working to secure the return of their property that had been stolen or seized during the Nazi era, for example. [Source](https://www.jmberlin.de/en/topic-leo-baeck)