https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Underwood-46
Biography
U.S. Southern Colonies Project logo
Tabitha (Underwood) Bowler was a Virginia colonist.
Tabitha is the daughter of _________ Underwood and Tabitha Minge, she is the half brother of John Edloe.[1] She was granted administratorship of her mothers will on April 4, 1671.[2]
Source
↑ Edlow, Bowler, Cocke and Adams Author: The William and Mary Quarterly, Volume 6. Published July 1, 1897. Page: 29 & 30.
↑ Minutes of the Council and General court of colonial Virginia, 1622-1632, 1670-1676 Author: Henry Read McIlwaine. Publisher: Richmond, Va.The Colonial Press, Everett Waddey Co 1924. Page 245.
Re
https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Underwood-46
Biography
U.S. Southern Colonies Project logo
Tabitha (Underwood) Bowler was a Virginia colonist.
Tabitha is the daughter of _________ Underwood and Tabitha Minge, she is the half brother of John Edloe.[1] She was granted administratorship of her mothers will on April 4, 1671.[2]
—-
The notes are:
I think there’s something to this, but it also eluded me to fall into place. This lady - Tabitha Bowler - different generation & marriage.
But definitely take more looks, these ladies didn’t have known birthdates, and married multiple times.
In the profile for Tabitha Hunt is the analysis that convinced me we don’t know this Tabitha’s origins. I’ll just extract the conclusion for you - it’s a complicated tale of (at least) Three Tabithas.
”Young Tabitha married Thomas Bowler/Boulware after April 1671 since she was not married when old Tabitha’s will was probated. Those who list the Tabitha who married William Hunt as an Underwood seem to believe that after Thomas Bowler died (will proved July 1679) she married William Hunt. A bit of simple math makes this highly unlikely. If young Tabitha was of age (21) in 1671 when she was granted probate of old Tabitha’s will. This means she had to be born no later that 1650. By 1694 when a Tabitha ???? married William Hunt young Tabitha would not have been young. She would have been at least age forty four. Not impossible to have a child but unlikely. Also there were other children who appear to have been born after 1894 [typo] …
Yep, a LONG time ago I went through the 'Young Tabitha' thing because the Boulware / Bowler line is direct for my deceased younger son. It was very confusing then. Then tonight I stumbled back into them as possible ancestors of a friend whose tree I've been trying to help with on Ancestry...and found myself revisiting the old confusion. lol