I see Francis Linthicom listed as father here, and a Thomas Francis Linthicom listed on several other sites, but no sources. Did Thomas come over with his father by the same name? Is there any record of his father being here? Is it possible that land records are confused because they were both here and both had the same name and both died about the same time?
"Genealogy of the Linthicum and allied famili es"
Gen. I
Thomas Linthicum, Sr., (name written Linscombe in list),
b. about 1640 in England or Wales, transported by Capt.
Edward Selbv to Maryland, prior to Julv 23, 1658, buried
Nov. 12, 1701. Will, May 17, 1699. Prob. Jan. 31. 1701.
By will at his death, he disposed of over 1200 acres of land.
Married Jane .
Children of Thomas axd Jane Linthicum
Gen. II-A Hezekiah, mar. Oct. 5, 1697, Milcah Francis b. Nov. 14,
1666, d. Dec. 22, 1721, dau. of Thomas and Ruth Francis of Rhodes River. Issue later.
Gen. II-B Mary mar. Richard Sno\vden III. before 1688.
Gen. II-C Jane mar. Thomas Rutland, Sr. Descendants lived at South River and in Annapolis, Md.
Gen. II-D Thomas, Jr., mar. June 22, 1698, Deborah Wayman (sometimes Weyman) daughter of Leon-
ard, Sr., and Dorcas Wayman. Deborah received 100 A of "Happy choyce" by will from her father.
https://archive.org/stream/genealogyoflinth00badg/genealogyoflinth0...
it provides PDF ad other versions
Thank you - yes, that is what I have too. But there are many sites - including this one and a number of Ancestry profiles - that list a FATHER of Thomas Linthicum the emigrant (about 1640 - 1701). He is listed as Thomas Francis Linthicum (Linscombe) 1614 - 1700, married to Sarah Burton, born in Wales, dying in All Hallows Parish in 1700, and coming over in or before 1658. I believe there is also a mention of this Thomas on Family Search and somewhere else - but NO SOURCE material is given. Is there any evidence at all that Thomas Linthicum, 1640-1701 came over with his father? That there were two of them? At least one, but possibly two narraitves refer to three different Thomases, as Thomas and Jane also had a son Thomas.