Joseph Burch, II - Joseph Burch (1758-1818) Misidentified Revolutionary War Military Service

Started by James Allison on Tuesday, April 13, 2021
Problem with this page?

Participants:

Profiles Mentioned:

Showing all 6 posts

Joseph Burch Descendants and researchers,

The following documents how Joseph Burch (1758-1818) of Georgia was incorrectly assigned Revolutionary War military service.

American Revolutionary War service was not attributed to Joseph Burch (1758-1818) of Georgia, until about 1959. Before 1959, no Burch researchers had mentioned American Revolutionary War service for Joseph Burch. In her book, Birch, Burch Family in Great Britain and America, Vol. II, with Addenda of; Families Allied to Burch Family of Georgia, Alabama, Florida and other States (1959), Marilu Burch Smallwood stated on page 51:

“Joseph Burch 250 acres of land, Certificate 1019, Col. Elijah Clarke (Voucher) – no date, but account of Bounty Land Certificates issued to persons claiming as Refugees or Citizens, by resolve or act of the 19th to 20th , Aug., 1781, by his honour Gov. Houston in the year 1784” (See pages 25-26 of “Receipts for Georgia Bounty Grants” by Ruth Blair.)

However, from the above Ruth Blair source, Marilu B. Smallwood misidentified Joseph Burks as Joseph Burch. The actual document was assigned to Joseph Burks. Joseph Burks and Joseph Burch were two separate individuals.

In her research, Marilu B. Smallwood mixed Burch, Burks, etc., claiming they were all part of the same family. I do not know of any genealogists who would do this today.

Based on Marilu B. Smallwood’s reference from her book, individuals began to join the National Society of the Sons of the American Revolution (SAR), and the National Society of the Daughters of the American Revolution (DAR).

About 1960, Allen Eugene Burch (national number 87009), joined the SAR through Joseph Burch (d. 1818). Allen E. Burch used the above reference from Marilu B. Smallwood as proof for membership. For the DAR, Vienna Burch McVay (national number 146306), submitted a supplemental application (an application in addition to one's original membership ancestor) for Joseph Burch (1758-1818). Vienna Burch McVay died in 1962.

At some point after 1960, the above stated Marilu B. Smallwood claim of American Revolutionary War service for Joseph Burch (1758-1818) was found to be invalid. Later, this invalid proof was replaced with Joseph Burch of the 2nd Maryland Regiment military service.

This situation looks like an attempt to keep the Joseph Burch lineage line open for membership in the DAR and SAR, where no actual proof ever existed.

In 2017, the original enlistment record of Joseph Burch of the 2nd Maryland Regiment was located in the Maryland Archives. The signature mark of Joseph Burch of the 2nd Maryland Regiment was an "X?". This signature mark does not match the known signature mark of Joseph Burch (1758-1818) of Georgia. Joseph Burch of Georgia had a signature mark of "IB". They appear to be two separate individuals.

Also, no one who ever joined the SAR or DAR appears to have been aware of the difference in the signature marks of Joseph Burch of the 2nd Maryland Regiment and Joseph Burch who died in Georgia.

Best regards,
James Allison

Headright grants (not bounty) for Joseph Burch (sometimes spelled Birch) in Richmond County, GA. images 158-166.

https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:33S7-9TRZ-BD?i=157&...

A bounty grant for Joseph Burck in Jackson County, GA, images 173-175.

https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:33SQ-GTRZ-V6?i=172&...

I note the clear distinction in formation of the manuscript small-case H and K, both final letters in each different surname (also located in entirely different counties of Georgia).

Modern readers frequently mistake an H for a K in manuscripts, but when compared side-by-side they obviously are not the same.

____________________________________________

(To potentially add to the confusion, there is another headright grant for land in Burke Co., GA -- for Jesse Burch).

(L. B. Burch also received a grant in Burke County).

Sorry, that is actually JOHN (not Joseph) BURCK who received the bounty grant referenced in my first post here.

Debra,

Thanks for the references to the Joseph Burch Headright grants.

Do you agree that there were two separate Joseph Burch men, one in Maryland and one in Georgia?

Since posting the message, I checked the DAR website and found that there were about 3 Joseph Burch (1758-1818) applications up to about 1959. Then after 1968, Joseph Burch applications increased dramatically. It appears that the Joseph Burch of the 2nd Maryland Regiment idea was introduced at that time.

I still have not located a document which proves that Joseph Burch of the 2nd Maryland Regiment was the same person as Joseph Burch of Georgia, nothing, nada.

Also, consider that In the 1880 United States Census, for Laurens County, Georgia, enumeration district 64, page 542B, Alfred Burch (1811-1894), a son of Joseph Burch (1758-1818) and his (2nd) wife Gilley Wilcox, identified “Georgia”, as the birthplace of his parents.

The currently reported (with no proof) birthplace of Joseph Burch (1758-1818) is Maryland, which was not recorded in any known historical public document.

What do you think?

James Allison

Yes, I'm not entirely convinced that Joseph Burch of the Maryland militia, Revolutionary War veteran, is the same person as Joseph Burch of Georgia, whose wives were both reportedly from Georgia. Something doesn't quite add up.

Maybe I missed it, but I don't seen any Bounty grants for a Joseph Burch in Georgia. (Burke or Burks) isn't the same surname as (Burch or Birch).

And a signature of X is definitely not the same as IB (or JB, as I see it, same signature in any case).

(Js and Is are often misinterpreted in manuscripts because many people back then were a bit careless in how they formed their letters. Technically, Js should extend below the baseline regardless of style of script, and Is shouldn't.

But often Js are seen formed almost identical to standard Is. Taking into consideration that very early printed texts didn't have Js, so Is were substituted for them, many people probably had a hard time understanding the difference.

I have the same issue with ancestors in my family whose Js and Is frequently get mixed up in translation, causing confusion for anyone unfamiliar with the facts.)

https://researchguides.gonzaga.edu/c.php?g=67719&p=3481156

Since books were treasured and rarely disposed of, many people likely learned to read from some really old texts.

Showing all 6 posts

Create a free account or login to participate in this discussion