Would this be the original Richard of Riccarton? The book of Wallace indicates the first Riccarton had 2 sons, Philip and Richard. P. 7, Richard Wallace the younger succeeded to the paternal estate and he also had 2 sons, Adam and Richard, @Adam Wallace, 3rd of Riccarton (which makes sense). Is this correct? I'm not sure where the Wormleighton comes in or if I have an extra generation or am missing one.
