https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seamer,_Scarborough
http://www.rupertwilloughby.co.uk/gleanings/a-notable-beneficiary-o...
I haven't figured out yet if there are two different men named Hugh de Port or two different biographies of the same man.
Good thing you discovered this.
Hugh de Port, Domesday lord of Basing
Their respective sons named Hugh:
Hugh de Port, Domesday lord of Basing
Henry de Port, sheriff of Hants.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hugh_de_Port
Another, apparently different biography for a Hugh de Port on Wikipedia.
Anyway, I'm sure our knowledgeable curators will sort it out.
Reliable source:
http://cybergata.com/roots/8861.htm
The extra Henry has no children attached, and just the dates that don’t agree. I’m merging him into his brother the MP.
If you really want to study up on the de Ports of Basing, check Rounds study.
https://fmg.ac/resources/scanned-sources/journals/file/609-s-3919
No worries.
For tree correction I would follow the http://cybergata.com/roots/8861.htm site and the MPs, and look to resolve data conflicts before doing anything. And get rid of grandiose titles! No one was a peer of the kingdom here. Take your time and be delicate: this is so extremely early in history.
I am skeptical about the parents given for Hugh de Port, Domesday lord of Basing
http://cybergata.com/roots/8863.htm begins the tree with him.
What does Rounds say?
Pam Wilson (on hiatus) Can you look at Hugh de Port, Domesday lord of Basing who married Eleanor de Leon vs his same name brother who married Orence de Port St. John, of Basing ? Your profile’s Biography seems mixed?
Hubert de Port, of. Mapledurwell, 1086.
Adam de Port, of Mapledurwell, temp. Hen. I,
Lord of the Honour of Kington.
;------.L-----,---,
Sybil.=Hoger de Port, of Mapledurwell, Hugh de Robert de
Lord of the Honour of Kington. Port. Port,
T----T----,
Adam de Port, of Maple- Hugh de Henry de Other
dnrwell, 1167, Lord of the Port. Port. sons.
Honour of Kington, exiled
1172
I think Rounds argued that the treasonous Adam de Port was the grandson of the first, and if so
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_de_Port_(d._1174)_
Still has them mixed up.
https://www.oxforddnb.com/view/10.1093/ref:odnb/9780198614128.001.0...#
Port, Adam de (fl. 1161–1174), landowner, was the son of Roger de Port (d. c.1161) and his wife, Sibyl d'Aubigny, and grandson of Adam de Port (d. c.1138), who was probably sheriff of Herefordshire in 1130, and who had the honour of ...
Hubert & Hugh de Port were not the same person (perhaps related).
https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Port-74
(Hubert and Hugh were sometimes confused before 1900 when Round, in the words of Complete Peerage, "placed the genealogy of both families on a sound basis and cleared up the confusion between the Ports of Basing and those of Mapledurwell or Herefordshire which had previously existed."[4] See Round.[5])
Erica Howton that is what I thought. Everything you said is what I thought. I just wanted confirmation on it. So according to this our tree needs some work with separating out the two lines I believe Hubert and Hugh were brothers. So can I make the changes needed or does it have to be a curator?
I don’t know that we can say Hubert & Hugh were brothers? That they were related seems likely.
Hubert is curated so we need Pam Wilson (on hiatus) to help figure straighten out the Biography on that: that’s the Adam de Port side & the “Mapledurwell” line.
Try working on the “Basing” line first. I’ll move Adam off of him, you can try adding the Sybil wife.
The way I handle these is to FIRST put the bio & family information in the profile, and an external link, “and then” edit. Be sure and resolve conflicting data.
Frankly we’re almost there with the Basing side.
Here’s a new Hubert de Port, I, of Mapledurwell with son Adam started. Can you continue it Keri Denise Jackson, ♊ Twin "A" ?
Private User The only thing that’s making sense to me is Hugh who married Orence as son of Hugh who married Eleanor de Leon.
It’s either that or they’re different altogether.
Round did not address the French Ancestry in any specific beyond location area. It looks like Keats-Rohan may have, and (I think) she’s affirming Round as son of Hubert, not Hugh.
Also I should note that Round’s chart looks like a dotted line from Hubert to Adam.
Screenshot is here:
https://media.geni.com/p13/25/9d/1a/2c/5344485090d82f46/ab1f7ce7-17...