Sophie van Gavere - All ok here?

Hi Joke,
I also have the Warlop set, no need to post photos, I'm doing that in the overview, just point out the issue. We're working on the whole tree, it's most complicated so I'm in and out of every profile many times. I try to note that a profile is a work in progress hoping that it avoids the awkward comments seen above.

Carl is collaborating and has full oversite on this effort, any duplicates created will be merged before we complete and the overview section for each profile will contain the sources, Warlop being primary to 1300 with support by many others. Please see the bibliography posted for this effort under Rasse 1 here: Rasse I (1062) of Gavre, lord of Gavere, baron of Flander, viscount of Ypres, crusader

Regarding the reference to Medlands, while we don't disregard Mr. Cawley, his input on this family is completely different from Warlop, he also has a completely different numbering system. Please see the initial discussion regarding the issues involved and how we intend to resolve them here: Good Day all...https://www.geni.com/discussions/249273?msg=1561385

I've also added other discussions below (that no one had yet read) regarding issues involved with specific issues encountered in this project, any reasonable discussion with solutions is encouraged.

Did Erasmus II (Lodewijk) van Gavere marry Estrude d’Aquitain de Carcassonne? https://www.geni.com/discussions/249377?msg=1562030
dite Nassau? For Raase I (1062-1096) https://www.geni.com/discussions/249502?msg=1562533
The parentage of Catherine de Cysoing? https://www.geni.com/discussions/249541
Who is Yolanda de Gavre https://www.geni.com/discussions/249480
Which Agnes married Baudouin, châtelain d’Ypres https://www.geni.com/discussions/249714
A few words regarding Eve dit “Damison” van Chièvres, héritière de Chièvre https://www.geni.com/discussions/249805
Detaching incorrect sources https://www.geni.com/discussions/249910

Also, I wanted to let you know that I've encountered a couple of profiles where you have added an image from Warlop and I've removed the image from the profile photo but not deleted it, it remains in the media tab where it can be enlarged and read. I've also developed the plan where the Warlop images of seals have a place in the overview section of the profile for which they support. A few of them require an explanation for clarity that they could not receive as a profile photo.

Hi Livio,
Can you advise which profile you have "cleaned up" per your statement "I cleaned up the situation a little by assigning the parents of the 4 son listed on it"

This is a work in progress and cleaning up a work in progress may confuse the larger picture we are dealing with. WE are rebuilding the van Gaver family of over 600 profiles and intermediate changes not managed by the curator or assigned managers can cause a great deal of confusion.

You can reach out to me anytime with reasonable questions or research-supported corrections and I will take them under consideration.

Livio,
I would appreciate your research on this Rasse "de Oude" as there have been numerous internet attempts to simplify this genealogy with the use of suffixs not used in history, and "de Oude", "de Jonge", "l'Aine" have all been used to the confusion of all. WE are working on clarifying this issue.

The back story for your information is: a Rasse had a brother also named Rasse both of whom were sons of a father named Rasse. All three fought in the battle of Bouvines, which was at that time in the county of Flanders. This Rasse was killed in battle on July 27, 1214. His brother died in 1241 (notice the similarities in the dates, easily conflated) and, as a historical coincidence, he died in Bouvines!, the site of the 1214 battle, which by 1241 was in Nord, France (Frankirk) due to the constant fluctuations of the border between Flanders and France during this period.

Hard research that we can cite please.