In the profile notes:
In his 1995 profiling of the immigrant, Robert Charles Anderson found no record of Mathias Button at New England prior to 1633. Anderson wrote further of the parentage claimed by the Nyes, saying[4]
"Such a baptism does exist, but there is no other evidence in support of this claim. Furthermore, since our Matthias is called at one point a "Dutchman," he presumably derived from a Germanic-speaking region on the Continent and not from England."
That would be this profile on Geni:
Hope this helps.
Erica, Geni volunteer curator
On FamilySearch.org, they listed his father as Thomas Button. Could it be another Thomas Button than the already existing profile?
Name: Matthias Button
Residence Place:
Gender: Male
Christening Date: 11 Oct 1607
Christening Date (Original): 11 OCT 1607
Christening Place: HARROLD,BEDFORD,ENGLAND
Birthplace:
Birth Date:
Name Note:
Death Date:
Father's Name: Thomas Button
Race:
Father's Birthplace:
Father's Age:
Mother's Name:
Indexing Project (Batch) Number: P00383-1
Mother's Birthplace:
Mother's Age:
System Origin: England-ODM
GS Film number: 845460
Reference ID:
Citing this Record:
"England Births and Christenings, 1538-1975," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:NP1F-DF6 : 11 February 2018, Matthias Button, 11 Oct 1607); citing , index based upon data collected by the Genealogical Society of Utah, Salt Lake City; FHL microfilm 845,460.
Not that I’m aware of.
In other words, it’s a valid Baptism record, and that Mattias has been identified as son of this Thomas Button
But Anderson’s Great Migration Project in 1995 examined it and determined this was not the Mattias who died in Haverhill.
Do you have AmericanAncestors or Ancestry to read the article for yourself?