Maren Moldrup - Please remove Maternal and Paternal lines for "Maren Moldrup" 1696

It is apples and bananas. You are comparing a chart of nobles with an entire family - only the two above mentioned brothers Jens Laasbye de Moldrup and Johan Rantzau de Moldrup were nobilitated in 1731. All their siblings were not. Nevertheless they are still sisters and brothers and have the same parents. It is already documented sufficiently in the Geni profiles. I will routinely complain about you activity.

Again, I don't care about http://www.roskildehistorie.dk/stamtavler/adel/smaa_danske/Moldrup.htm, it only deals with nobles. I addition to the two sons mentioned by you and all the boys who died young, Peder Nielsen Mollerup and Mette Laasby had a third son Niels. He was born in 1698 (twin-brother of Mette Marie Moldrup) and died as late as 1766. He was never married and stayed at home (Vestervigkloster). That could be the reason why he was not nobilitated in 1731, or he may have suffered from some illness or handicap. As an uncle to 40-50 nieces/nephews he is very often mentioned as a witness at baptisms.

I will not remove Maren Moldrup the first born child of Mollerup & Laasbye.

I do understand your unsubstantiated request. Vestervig Churchbooks starts 1697. The date mentioned can be found in literature about the Moldrup family. I refers to the link (Jeppe Aakjær's account) http://www.arkivthy.dk/images/jyskhistorie/Aakj%C3%A6r,%20Jeppe%20%... (on p.28 of 30 he lists the 13-14 children that could be useful for your comparisons) Marens marriage Oct 3 1715 in Vestervig is here
https://www.sa.dk/ao-soegesider/da/billedviser?epid=17127948#159442...

Mette, you know that roskildehistorie.dk is a school project made by kids and is not reliable as a source?

Mette is fact refractory and just started a similar public discussion - same source - other serious Geni users may waste their time. Same history every day
https://www.geni.com/discussions/191449?msg=1270812

NOTE: Please be aware that comments have been deleted from this discussion

Customer Service, please close this discussion