Susannah Emerson (McDaniel) - Help

Started by Cynthia Curtis, A183502, US7875087 on Saturday, January 12, 2019
Showing all 8 posts
1/12/2019 at 4:40 PM

I can forever accept that she may not be descended from a made up "MOYTOY" but can someone please tell me what needs to be done to give her back her NA identity?

1/12/2019 at 6:36 PM

Under the personal tab is a field for ethnicity.

We don’t know the background of Sookie (Su-Gi) "Granny Hopper" McDaniel

My thought would be to fill in the “ethnicity” field for her and her daughter as “said to be Native American”

1/12/2019 at 7:00 PM

It already says "Full blood Cherokee"
Not sure who put it there; likely been there as long as the profile has. I have no reason to change it as I do not know

1/12/2019 at 7:01 PM

The request is regarding Susannah, however. I searched years ago. Got nowhere. Just thought someone could weigh in as I have left the supposed Cherokee lines alone for now.

Thank you though.

1/12/2019 at 7:04 PM

I'll get back around to her eventually

1/22/2019 at 6:42 PM

Well, that was kind of painful.

4/22/2019 at 4:12 PM

In hindsight, I feel I was WRONG to agree to the disconnection from this line. I ended up deleting her from my Ancestry tree and deleting my ENTIRE gedcom on Gedmatch but THAT did NOT stop the DNA matches from coming on AncestryDNA and Thrulines, etc.

I ended up reporting the curator for saying she EVISCERATED the line. I UNfriended said curator on Facebook over the incident.

Some day, CODIS and genealogy will walk hand-in-hand.

In the meantime, let THIS comment serve as a reminder.....There may be spurious trees but the "DNA don't lie"...

4/23/2019 at 5:12 AM

Alexander McDaniel’s children were all born after 1790. Katy McDaniel’s children were not named McDaniel. James Hicks provided “Granny” with a long list of undocumented children, including a Susannah, but no spouses, no children, and there is no mention of any of these people in any Cherokee records.

Showing all 8 posts

Create a free account or login to participate in this discussion