In 2016 Thomas Holcombe was added to the spurious pedigrees section because of the lack of evidence for his parentage however a note in Gilbert Holcombe's page says
"04-02-97 From: Lorin A. Snyder 01:43 PM
Date: Wednesday, 02-Apr-97 01:43 PM
From: Lorin A. Snyder \ Internet:(snyderl@acadl.stvincent.edu)
To:Messenger Family Genealogy List \ Internet:
(messenger@rmgate.pop.indiana.edu)
Subject: MESSENGER-related families
Hello,
On a side-note, dealing with MESSENGER-related families, there is news. I know a bunch of us on this list descend from the Connecticut HOLCOMBE family, via Catherine HOLCOMBE, wife of Joseph MESSENGER and Experience HOLCOMBE, wife of Nathaniel ALFORD. Catherine and Experience were first cousins once removed.
The progenitor of said HOLCOMBE family was Thomas HOLCOMBE, who married Mrs. Elizabeth FERGUSON. For some time, it had been said that Thomas was *likely* the son of Gilbert and Anne (Courtenay) HOLCOMBE, both of incredible royal lineage. However, one problem with that claim was the plaque of HOLCOMBE ancestry above the tomb of Sir John de HOLCOMBE, Knight of the Third Crusade and ancestor of Gilbert HOLCOMBE. Thomas was not included on that plaque (although neither were some others who claimed descent).
Well, I have been informed by a HOLCOMBE researcher, to my complete surprise, that the missing part of that plaque has been found. A brother of Gilbert emigrated from England, (eventually his ancestors ended up in Australia), and had taken part with them. In 1995, that plaque was discovered and did, in fact, have Thomas Holcombe as the son of Gilbert and Anne (COURTENAY) HOLCOMBE.
I have a *monstrous* file on the ancestors of Gilbert and Anne, and am still in the process of putting it all together. As it goes through Charlemagne, among those in many other royal houses, some of the ancestry goes back to the first couple centuries A.D. King Alfred the Great's ancestry, from a book written in the 900's, goes back to B.C. time.
I have tons of ancestors of my MESSENGERS and related colonial families (including some not on your page, Debbie). I could see what I can do about posting lineages.
Lorin Snyder snyderl@acadl.stvincent.edu"
So there seems to be proof that Gilbert Holcombe and Anne Courtenay DID HAVE a son named Thomas so perhaps some debate about if wheter Thomas Holcombe should be in the spurious pedigrees section.