Some people are fans of a particular genre/celebrity and want to create profiles for them. If a fictional character as long as they are well labelled and seperate from the tree they cause no harm.
All users have the ability to report a profile. There are dufferent classifications. Fake for fictional characters or completely made up names. Claimed Historical Profile for a user who has said they are Queen Elizabeth for example.
Where issues occur is if a fake profile becomes linked to an actual profile.
Some of these trees with a notable main person are school projects. We even have had pedigree trees for dogs and horses. For all these Geni is a perfect tool for a shared/collaborative tree. For us who work on the world tree they make no harm as long as they are unconnected.
What is worse is role-playing groups with wild family connections using Geni to build a tree. The worse tree so far, not yet fully removed contained 56 users, - all fake.
I don't agree that just because a name is the same name as a famous person that automatically makes them a fake duplicate of the famous person.
On Geni alone there are
- Albert Einstein - son of Harry Einstein and Thelma Goodman - changed his name to Albert Brooks
- Hans Albert Einstein - son of Albert Einstien and Mileva Maric
- Albert Einstein - son of Rudolf Einstein and Anna Bischheim
- Albert Elliott Einstein - son of Leopold Einstein and Bertha Rauh
- Albert Einstein - son of Lazarus Einstein and Marianne Landauer
- Albert Einstein - husband of Betty Blattner
- Albert Einstein - son of Julius Einstein and Babette Schwarz
Yes, Leanne, and all of these examples are connected to a family. Not so with the "fakes."
Some examples:
Private User (Note gender!)
Private User
Humphrey bogart
Humphrey Bogart
Here's a "tree" that smells fake to me: https://www.geni.com/family-tree/index/6000000020222856422
Note "name" of "manager"