Private User is this on the right track?
From http://www.genealogy.com/forum/surnames/topics/harris/18898/
"More work needs to be done, but circumstantial evidence seems to indicate that Edward Harris was born about 1628 in Shirley Hundred, Charles City County, Virginia, as the youngest son of John Harris and Dorothy Lymbry, and as such, would not have enjoyed any substantial inheritance from his father John who was moderately wealthy for the time period and location. I believe that he settled in the Pagan River area with his other siblings in the late 1640's while still a teenager and was married to Martha Hardy about 1655. Based on my research, it appears that John Harris and Dorothy Lymbry had the following children: Thomas 1616; Dorothy 1619; John 1624; Robert 1626; Edward 1628. There may have been two more who died as infants."
NO! Nothing written by James Hargraves is considered true. He kept reinventing his line of ancestry every time we proved him wrong in our Harris DNA Surname Project. His only objective was to claim descent from Sgt John Harris d1638, and thence to his royal ancestry. by hook or by crook. DNA has proven conclusively that the Edward Harris d1677 was a brother of Thomas Harris d1688. The Pagan River Harris family of Upper Parish IOW was NOT related to either the Crixie England Harris family nor their descendants in Charles/James City of those of the Blackwater River area in the Lower Parish of IOW. This is all documented in the John Brayton 1995 book. Sgt John had no son named Edward but did have several other children including a son George who died in 1663 in Charles City, married with no issue. His plantation was inherited by his brother Thomas Harris d1677. FYI, the property of Thomas Harris d1677 was forfeited to the crown for his role as the leader of Bacon's rebels so his children received nothing. Until his death a few years back, James Hargraves still claimed that the Thomas Harris d1672 was the son of Sgt John Harris. But the yDNA of his close Harris cousin proved him to be from an entirely unrelated line of Harris.
http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~gohrpage/harrisdn...
Last updated August 1, 2015. You should test, Rob. :)
That's exactly where I told Rob to go to after he looked at the main Harris result that show all of the submitters and their markers values in each group. It's important to look at the big picture before clicking on the link above group 4 to go to the page you cite.
Gotta stop as I sprained my right wrist late night and can only hunt and peck with my
left hand that tembles with Parkinsons. Plewse forgive any typos or garbled spelling.