I'm starting this discussion from the profile of Henry Creech, whom I have just unmerged from his wife's other husband, Capt. Henry Creech, Sr.
I was cheerfully tidying up the Creeches, when, alas, I discovered that Really We Have No Consensus On Reality Here At All.
Though I knew; don't.
Erica Howton you may be able to help here.
Things that we sort of know but don't fit together:
One inherited family story is that Richard Creech (Creich, also, or Crich) left Fife (this sometimes shows up as "the Highlands," which may be due simply to a misunderstanding of geography), brought by William Carter as an indentured servant, in 1622. They came to James City. This is nicely specific but evidence is not to hand.
There is a Richard Critch who shows up on a passenger list, coming from London to America in 1635. What this has to do with Henry's father I do not know.
Anyway! Continuance of family story! Richard Creech, his wife Frances Beale, young daughter, all killer by Indians in 1630. Henry survived on account of not being home. His brother Nicholas was also killed. Or, maybe not. But Henry, and maybe Nicholas, if he wasn't dead, was raised by Frances's brother, John Beale, whose will, 1721, has Henry Creech as one of the witnesses.
Further confusing details: William Carter was given 100 acres in 1636, for transfer of Michael Siler and Richard Crich.
And one story is that the Richard Creech who came in 1635 was killed by Indians along with the entire family, except for Henry.
Clearly any Richard Creech who emigrated in 1622 and was killed in 1630 was not emigrating in 1635 and being killed after that, date undisclosed.
And here is me doubting that TWO Richard Creeches emigrated to James City from Scotland and got killed by Indians.
In case you are wondering, the major Jamestown massacre was 1622, which may be how that date wandered into the story. There was another major confrontation in 1644; in between those dates were a treaty and other various deaths. So the Only Survivor story isn't impossible.
Who are these Henry Creeches? How are they related, if they are? What validity does the only survivor story have?
This all runs together and doesn’t much resemble the Geni tree. Frankly I would do a skeleton tree based on it separately and then compare.
http://freepages.rootsweb.com/~paday/genealogy/dobbers/creech.htm with disclaimer
Richard Creech of the “Journeyman” in 1622/1623 d 1630 murdered in (what incident) m (maybe Frances) Beale, daughter of Robert Beale & Mary Belt (let’s find this family), sister of John Beale Sr.
Their children:
1. daughter killed by Indians
2. Henry Creech Sr (1621 - 1709) m Joyce Paine (1633 - 1712), daughter of Benjamin Paine
3. Nicholas Creech
Cross ref previous discussion
https://www.geni.com/discussions/133977?msg=930212
I think Richard Crouch of the Maine is a different person.
There’s no mention of his family.
https://books.google.com/books?id=HUqRznvpxsMC&pg=PA19&lpg=PA19&dq=...
—
Why is he attached to David Bethune?
Comment From ancestry member:
I'm struggling with the conflicting timelines in this history. The 1635 arrival date makes sense if the Indian attack was the one that occurred in 1644. 1622 arrival makes sense for the 1630 Indian attack and is more inline with Henry's date of birth (1621) and birth location (Scotland). Henry is my 8th gr-grandfather, however, no one in my family has traced our line back this far until now, so I have no "family" stories to compare to. I'm really curious if anyone has updated these histories since they were published in 2012.
Note: Third Anglo-Powhatan Wars, 1644-1646. So far no list of the dead.
I don’t know of a particular incident in 1630 although not a surprise if there was one. In any case, Crouch & Creech are after 1622.
Disconnected Richard Creech (Critch, Creich) as child of Lady Margaret Ogilvie & David Bethune, 7th of Creich
Unless TSP had something to say.
Private - is
Henry Creech, Sr., of Roquist Swamp the same as Capt. Henry Creech, Sr. ? They are matching.
Anne Brannen - improved the tree.
If we take “Richard Crouch” and “David Bethune” (!!!!) out of it, this is no worse than most Jamestown arrivers now.
Hope I helped.
New project: https://www.geni.com/projects/Transport-of-London-1635/4478124
Interesting discussion. I am really curious about where all the stories of Richard Creech come from. Documentation is lacking. I cannot find David Bethune of Creech having a son David. A son Robert supposably died about 20 years old. Possible he had. falling out and left home changing his name. But no evidence of that. Richard Crouch that JM Creech mentions is listed in a census after 1622 attack as born about 1586, a carpenter, and from shire in England. So doesn't seem to be right. The 1635 Richard Creech fits better. Carter name is with his.
James Michael Creech - that was pretty much my thinking also.
I don’t see how a Bethune became a Creech though, or why one would.
Apparently some soldier types were living more at the periphery of Jamestown in 1644, and there was something I read about Creech possibly an ex soldier? Anyway it doesn’t make sense with the story of wife & daughter killed.
Also, that Henry was “away at school.” What school? University of Edinburgh? :)
Cont. (Meant David not having a son Richard of course, he did have a David. Also should typed Crich not Creech. Doing this on my phone late at night) Can't find a ship Journeyman. Though historians admit we don't have all passenger lists for the period. So its possible their is another Richard Crich or whatever the name was Another concern is Mary Frances Beale is supposed to be English. In a time of limited travel. How did an English commoner meet and marry a Scottish nobleman's son in Scotland. More likely if he left home that he had gone to England and met and married her there. There are very few women on the passenger lists or census making it unlikely, though not impossible they met and married in Jamestown shortly after his arrival as some have said either Last question. Where does the story of the family being killed by Indians come from? Is there any historical source? I don't doubt it I just want to be accurate. Lords and Indians make an amazing genealogy but only if true. Perhaps J M Creech and others have non public sources. I know a lot of families had meticulous family histories written down in old family bibles. Perhaps they had access to some of them. If anyone has information that can give us a firm footing for our family story I would love to hear it. I will enjoy following your discussion. I think we are all curious. Thank you all for sharing my interest in our heritage.
James Michael Creech - I can tell you just from point of view of having many early Virginia arrivers.
And except for the few who made the history books, or were officials - we know bupkus about most until much, much later. And of the sketchy records that were preserved (land records mostly, and other legal instruments), much went up in smoke. They call them “burned over counties,”
I’d like to hear from Anne about her sense “was Creech really Scots” for example, because my guess would have been English. Although England was ethnically diverse, so he could have been origin / Scots living in England.
I say this because the Scots (and Welsh and French) tended to be more obviously so. I do have an early Ross to Elizabeth City County, who did marry a clearly English origin person. And Ross can be an English name. But he was noted as Scots, so I think he must have been. Was Creech?
Another question to ask is about Henry. And actually that’s where history “really” begins, because he’s in a Will! So yay! He’s definitely a Beale.
And they’re saying the Beale was English, but the most famous Beale in the Colonies (many years later) was very, very Scots. So are so sure mother “Frances” (it’s only a guess name) was English?
If Richard was from Creich Parish (Noble or commoner he possible could have taken the parish name as a surname. Bethune seems to be the Family name for the Lord. Creich was the place of his authority. I read somewhere that there is no record of Creich surname that early in Scotland. I have wondered the same thing about the boys Supposably in school north. In 1600s Virginia where would that be? Jamestown was probably about it. If Henry and Nicholas were about 9 and 11 I doubt they are in a university in England. Especially if Richard is living on a guards pay. The first story I read about the massacre said the boys were out in the fields when the Indians attacked the house. Thus they were able to hide.
Now as to being a laird’s son.
Nah.
Why do I say that? Because Scots sent their younger sons to the colonies to look after their business interests (ie the rum trade). There would be no reason to hide or downplay identity & every reason to trumpet it. And there would have been stories of money in the family which there aren’t.
Most arrivers were indentured servants. Most arrivers died brutally and young. It was a harsh colony,
Look into Henry, where History begins. There might be more to find out on the Beale’s, since they managed to survive.
You are right about it all being sketchy. My understanding is that the British burned most of the records from that period during the War of 1812. Alot of census records and legal documents went up in smoke. Things are really sketchy about Richard's wife too that's for sure. Like you I wonder what we can be sure of before Henry I don't think we even know when or where he was born
Re: Henry and Nicholas being in the fields during the Indian attack that killed their parents. My source is the Creech Family History by James Milton Creech which is on the web. I believe it was the revised version (1980) I don't know his source. But there is no source that I know of for the "at school" story we see on the web.
Haven't invested money in paid subscriptions. Have a family tree that my nephew got from Ancestry.com. It has errors. A lot of people in the family have the same first name. I started tracing it backwards and it was wrong. Not going to pay for sloppy work Last couple days have read a couple Beale family histories trying to get a hold on Henry's parents. Find that both histories say Beale, Beal, and Bell are the same family in Virginia. Also remember Richard Crich arrived 1635 as a servant of Mr. Carter. Well John Bell/Beale arrived in 1638 also paid for by the same Carter. So that could connect Richard and John I was thinking if Richard was the son of a noble (uncertain for sure) he would have been trained in weapons growing up. So the possibility does exist for the story he forsook the family and ended up indentured as a guard in Virginia. Definitely uncertain. Now another twist. I was reading a Beal/Bell family history. It said that Frances Beale Creech was great granddaughter of Sir George Bell. That she arrived in Virginia in 1623. Was killed in an Indian attack in 1630 with her husband Richard Creech and daughter. Her sons Nicholas and Henry survived and were sent back to England where they were raised by uncle John, Frances's brother. Some years later they returned to Virginia. If that is so then Richard Crich 1635 would not be Henry's father. The Beale/Bell story may be borrowed from a Creech history. There is no documentation. So the roots are as twisted and knotted as ever. Let me know if you learn anymore.
Erica thank you. There are a couple interesting books on Google books on Beale,Beal and Bell family history. I have looked at them free. It is interesting that your last name is Howton. Richard Crouch on the 1623 survivors census is listed as being from Howton, England. What a coincidence if he was if he married a Beale. Anyway you are correct who knows what is fact and what is stretch to make an interesting genealogy. The Creech family history claims Richard came on the ship Journeyman in 1622 or 23. I have read exactly the same thing on the Crouch family history about Richard Crouch. But Creech history says he was from Scotland born in 1600. According to the 1623 records Richard Crouch was from Howton (now Houghton) England and born in 1586. I think it is quite possible James Milton Creech made a stretch (possibly intentionally or on poor information) to combine the two. Crouch name could have become Creech Shakespeare had 5 or six variations. Beal, Beale and Bell But this is two different people not name spellings or pronunciations. Perhaps Richard Creech 1635 was. Henry's father. Perhaps the massacre story belongs to the Crouches. Or perhaps Henry's father is an English carpenter from Howton,, not the son of a Scottish nobleman. Creech is listed as a variation of both Crouch and Crich.
Perhaps we will never know who was Henry's father. For it may not be any of the above. But we do know there are contradictions in the traditional family story. . There are other Crouches who arrived in the 30s, 40s, and 50s. I find no other Crich arrivals. But for that matter I don't finds Ship Journeyman either. Records are incomplete. History is in a fog. Perhaps a jigsaw puzzle that an never be completed. Some are happy to fill in facts with tales. Perhaps they are the lucky ones for they take pleasure in completed story. Myself I yearn for truth. Perhaps I will scour the records racking my brain and tossing and turning on bed at night haunted by this puzzle till my dying breath. Much I have said before. I have only tried to pull it all together. Good luck and success in your searches.