Can Curators be given power to remove profile photos?

Last time I heard, only the manager who places a photo on a profile can remove it.

This is very unsatisfactory. To take an example:

Sir Thomas Drewe

a decent sixteenth-century gentleman, appears as a late 19th/early 20th century gent. It is true that Queen Elizabeth I once visited him, and he was probably rather poorer as a result, but he obviously didn't have to go into hiding because his descendants continued to occupy his property. It was probably not added by one of the profile's current managers, which means that they can't remove it.

Last night I came across a profile which proclaimed that its owner was "the last generation to live in Europe". He now has three generations of European descendants beneath him (and his American "children" are almost certainly a fake genealogy anyway).

Curators should be able to have the power to remove misleading photos, and should take this issue up with Geni. They can always raise the possibility that I, or someone else, might start flooding the site with pornographic photos; someone needs to be able to take them off again.

Mark