Please do NOT merge unsourced duplicates into the MEDIEVAL tree

Craig Andrew Miles thanks. The family had been sort of interestingly garbled.

Curated profiles Thomas Smith and Margaret Powle show two sons named John--
https://www.geni.com/merge/compare/6000000199655569229?return=duplicates_6000000033025518445%2B5392951116140136472%2C6000000176102516836%2B5389852229940107786%2C6000000005739193459%2B6000000176102516869_5392926380890108924___4&to=5393148693750082051
John Smith
John Smith adds a son

And these-- I merged some below but they are getting muddier, not clearer so I will step off--
Richard Smith
Richard Smith, Jr.

Ann Way
wife of Richard Smith, Sr
mother of
Richard Smith, Jr.
Richard Smith
Richard Smith?through=6000000176102516830
Thank you

I came across a mess- please assist, not sure where to post this.

In my opinion, someone got the Edmund Prestwich guys mixed up big time!

Wow is all I can say. about Edmund Prestwich, III of Hulme

Need a curator who may understand our Prestwich lineage a bit.

I'm a little sad, we had this organized and smooth, now it's all whacked up again. I just don;t know where to begin this time without a curator's assistance.

Please.... if someone could just undo the last merges?

Thank you

Suzan Martin - I took a walk through the revisions for Edmund Prestwich, III of Hulme No merges in the past several years. (October 2019 was the last merge.)

The second set of parents was manually added in February of this year.

Think I have the problems figured out. Thank you.

1540

These 2 appear to be the same

Francis Glanfield
Francis Glanfield

Wife

• Elizabeth Glanfield
• Elizabeth Glanfield
• Elizabeth Glanfield

Albert, you need to post links please.

In the Medieval tree, we don't merge duplicates unless they're better than the MPs they're being merged into. We isolate them, so twenty more people don't have to be involved in merging and fixing the exponentially increasing conflict ripples created, without benefit to the tree.

No surprise to anyone, those twenty people don't appreciate being used as merge monkeys because other people don't just request management, and actually don't log in weekly to do it - so it creates a medieval tree constantly filled with Conflicts.

You understand :-)

From my merge center - https://www.geni.com/search/matches?id=6000000007603563477&src=profile&cmp=btn (Sir Thomas Finch, Kt)
His son also has a match - https://www.geni.com/search/matches?id=6000000000806390216&src=profile&cmp=btn (Sir Moyle Finch, MP, 1st Baronet)
William Finch is a mess.

Sir Godfrey de Lovaine, of Little Easton seems to be the same person as Godfrey III Lothier Duc de Lorraine , but without relationships connections

Removed and MPed original, Ken. Thanks for spotting

Isolated, Dimitri. Thank you

Whichever one of you will be working on my message from earlier today (https://www.geni.com/discussions/158450?msg=1767767), please DM me. I have info from the user who created the duplicates.

Update - https://www.geni.com/merge/view?revision_id=87231896290 this merge was done today. It leaves Sir Moyle Finch, MP, 1st Baronet (old) vs Sir Moyle Moilo Finch, 1st Baronet of Eastwell (new).

From my merge center today - https://www.geni.com/search/matches?id=6000000004681090463&src=profile&cmp=btn.
Sir Thomas Gerard, of Kingsley and Bryn is a mess. His offspring do not agree with the "Overview." The children are not with the correct mother. (I will not fix because I don't want to make the mess worse.)

1591
Sir James James de Mauleverer
Sir James James de Mauleverer

Already merged in

Tree conflicts at

• son in law - George Wright, esq. of Bolton-on-Swale
• grand-daughter - Beatrice Wright

NOTE: George Wright 1711-1769 cannot be the child of George Wright, esq. of Bolton-on-Swale 1629-1674 and Beatrice Wright 1630-1682 so I have detached him

1549
MP - John Samson

Duplicate - John Samson

further on from https://www.geni.com/discussions/158450?msg=1768759

John died in 1589 so can't be the father of

• Robert Sampson born 1592
• George Sampson born 1595

This one is 1636 but if merged will cause an issue with the pre 1600 parents as they have different parents.

Elizabeth Potts Bennett
Elizabeth Potts

5th generation brings in new profiles Private

However 6th generation is again duplicates
George Bond Tyson
George Bond Tyson

9th generation brings in new profiles at William Reese cress

Dimitri Vulis
Both isolated.

MP - Sir George Neville, 1st Baron Latimer

Duplicate - George Neville

1575 / 1588

Louis Campeau dit Limousin
Louis Campeau dit Limousin

Re above

Already merged at Charles D. Campau

Please review this merge which I believe was made in error. I'm not sure if the 'duplicate?' needs to be isolated. The merge brought in a third husband and perhaps three more children for the Abbesse.

https://www.geni.com/merge/view?revision_id=86869378960

Mathilde de Béthune, dame de Choques

Hugues de Houdain, seigneur de Choques