Regarding variations of Danish names

Started by Joachim יהוֹיָקִים Hawn on Friday, September 11, 2015
Showing all 4 posts
9/11/2015 at 4:52 PM

My gr. gr. grandparents immigrated to the U.S. in 1881. Actually, in total three generations immigrated at roughly the same time. My specific questions pertain to my x2 gr. parents: Rasmus Christian Rasmussen 1854-1921, and Hansine Jakobine Christensen 1861-1932 They had married in Copenhagen in 1876. Prior to immigrating, they had two Danish born daughters.

Almost immediately upon arrival in the U.S., my grandfather adopted the name: Chris Robertson. He was rather inconsistent in the early years in terms of always documenting the same name. In some places it would be Rasmus Rasmussen, or Christian Robertson, or Chris Robertson. It has made tracking his progress across the nation, rather interesting to say the least! Was this practice of 're'naming a fairly common feature in the Americanization and assimilation of immigrant experience?

Although there is no evidence the name was of legal process, by no later than 1888, he had fully embraced the new name. Also in 1888 Chris and Hansine were 're' married in Iowa and on the state and county marriage records details, the name Chris Robertson is used in place of Rasmus Rasmussen. My grandmother did not formally change her surname however, nor did she take 'Robertson' as her own. But each one of their children subsequently born in the U.S. in fact were all given the surname Robertson....with the exception that is, for the two eldest daughters born in Denmark. Their maiden names remained Rasmussen. That is my next question: was there some reason you know of as to why they would not simply adopt the new American'ized' family name? They would have been pretty young to have exercised the kind of autonomy required to choose to remain separate from the rest of the family by the name they identified by.

While it has been difficult at times identifying my grandfather as he transitioned from the name of his birth to the name of his choosing, it is my grandmother Hansine who has proven the most problematic in terms of identifying her in Directories, Census', Voter's registration and other historical documents. The reason, is because while she may not have formally adopted a single name, she nonetheless used several variations of Hansine Jakobine Christensen over the years. Only in one instance that I can recall did she ever list herself as 'Robertson' and that was on the U.S. marriage record of 1888. Likewise, her only use of Rasmussen was on her immigration documents.

Beyond that, I have encountered a rather bewildering array of names that i must wonder... if such dexterity in name uses was a Danish cultural tradition, or was my grandmother simply a colorful woman? Among the names I have seen her record for herself are:
Hanseena Christensen, Sena Sine or 'Sine' Christensen, and Hansine Nielsen. The only reason I was able to identify this last example, is because her father's name was Kristen Nilsen and there appears to have been a period of time in which she attempted following our U.S. custom of a child inheriting the father's surname, rather than the Danish tradition of her surname being derived from her father's given name. Whatever the incentive, it did not endure. Following Kristen's death, she never again referred herself as a 'Nielsen'. But the maddening instances of the variations I mentioned continued throughout her life - thus making it at times virtually maddening to successfully identify her at a given point in time. Is this a Danish cultural practice, or is it peculiar to Hansine? Are there any additional names I should have on my radar when researching her? Thank you, in advance. Joachim Hawn

9/11/2015 at 10:15 PM

Very normal. Scandinavians understood their system. Americans didn't. Just try explaining to someone why you have a different surname than your parents, your wife, your children. And, if you did explain, there was a good chance that you were wasting everyone's time with something they didn't think was relevant.

In America the church wasn't enforcing the name on your baptism record. There was much less bureaucracy than now. Your name was whatever you said it was. People rarely went to court for a name change. In some cases you are probably seeing the name as recorded by someone who knew your ancestor in a Scandinavian context, and in others by someone who knew them only in an American context. There was probably much less variation in practice than you see in the records, but there was probably still a transition period when your ancestor had different names inside their community than outside.

Men often struggled between anglicizing their own patronymic, or using their father's, particularly if their father immigrated at the same time or just a bit a later. Same for women, but they had the additional problem of giving up -datter for -sen. Sometimes they ended up using their father's patronymic, and sometimes it took them a few years to assimilate enough to start using their husband's new surname derived from his patronymic or his father's.

People who don't document their immigrant ancestors any deeper than the census every 10 years often miss the transition names. You are very lucky that you have dug deeper to see the rich variety. For ancestors who came in 1881 if you had stayed with just the census, you would see them only in 1900 and you might even miss them on a census or two after that. You are very lucky to have the messy details.

Do you know why Chris and Hansine were re-married? Very unusual.

9/11/2015 at 10:48 PM

I really appreciate your comments. As for the reason for their second marriage, I do recall as a small child my gr. grandmother, their daughter saying that it was so important to her father that his children born in the States have 'American' sounding names. I'm not sure what precisely his motive was, but since he did also use it as an occasion to document his new name, I suspect in his mind, it also was legitimizing his children's claims upon their own American nationality. it has been a question much pondered by many of us descendants.
Thanks again....
Joachim

9/14/2015 at 12:24 AM

Hi there Joachim I just saw your question about danish names. I did'nt see it before because I had visiters from Chicago this weekend.

I'll send you an invitation to the project. "Introduction for people with danish roots" Here you can read more about the danish naming tradition and also get in contact with others with danish roots and danes of cause in general!

I think Justin has descriped it but if you have any thing you want to descuss any further you are welcome to ask ofcause!

Showing all 4 posts

Create a free account or login to participate in this discussion