Please come and vote on the following in this Discussion:
http://www.geni.com/discussions/132812?msg=954617&page=2
IN THE CASE OF De Villiers Pama Nos presently in the Suffix Field THAT CONTRADICT THE ACTUAL PROFILE POSITION ON THE TREE*
SHOULD WE:
1) Keep the FACTUALLY INCORRECT GISA DV NUMBERS IN THE SUFFIX FIELD?
(Ignoring the mis-merges this will create because it contradicts the Geni tree)
2) Remove the factually incorrect DV numbers to the aka/About, and PUT FACTUALLY CORRECTED DV NUMBERS IN THE SUFFIX FIELD, & lock the name/suffix field?
(Ignoring the fact that GISA hasn't got the resources to update them yet)
3) LEAVE THE DV NUMBERS OUT OF THE SUFFIX ALTOGETHER & PUT THEM IN THE AKA ONLY (& lock the Suffix Field to prevent them being added there.)
*(eg the DNA corrected BIOLOGICAL FATHER of Theunis Botha/Appel http://www.geni.com/discussions/127041?msg=954609 or THE CORRECTED SIBLING RANK ORDER of newly 'discovered' Stam Vader kids from slaves born in between their kids from White wives )
Voting closes Monday
Thanks
Love the cuzzins