Hello Donna,
Just to help fill in a few gaps; the four-letter Hebrew word יהוה (latinized YHWH), is known as the "Tetragrammaton" (originating from a Greek word τετραγράμματον, which means "four letters").
Six vowelized Hebrew spellings of the tetragrammaton are found in the Leningrad Codex of 1008 CE –1010 CE. The name was vowelized to show how the word would be pronounced if read - and it is pronounced in six different ways.
Pronunciation of the Tetragrammaton "יהוה" (YHWH) varies according to language and region. Jehovah is used in many medieval Christian Bibles - but that's not a common usage today. Samaritans pronounced the Tetragrammaton as "Iabe" (Yabeh). Some old versions of Septuagint ascribe a Koine Greek pronunciation "Iao" (Yao).
The oldest known inscription of the tetragrammaton dates to 840 BCE, on the Mesha Stele -- it is the earliest known reference to the Israelite god "יהוה" (Yahweh). For most religious/observant Jews, we avoid pronouncing or writing the Tetragrammaton - as such it is not a "Jew word for God".
Indeed, the most widely known pronunciation of the Tetragrammaton (YHWH) among non-Jews is "Yahweh". We can thank Heinrich Friedrich Wilhelm Gesenius (1786–1842) for suggesting that the Hebrew punctuation יַהְוֶה, which is transliterated into English as "Yahweh"
The origins of the term Jehovah came from early English translators who transposed vowels from "Adonai" to the Tetragrammaton, and read the word literally so that the Y in YHWH, was pronounced as a J in English, and the W as a V.
To recap, "Yahweh" is not "a Jew word for God" - it is a latinized form a Christian translator's mistake which has become a common usage among non-Jews.
If I can answer any questions, please feel free to contact me. Curators are here to help educate, arbitrate disputes, handle difficult merges and provide subject matter expertise wherever possible.
Warm regards,
J
haha!!!!
I've heard that before :) I was once in the Chicago, visiting the Kollel and studying, when one of the local 'regulars' upbraided me for heresy.
I was involved in a discussion of Rambam's 13 Principles when I made the mistake of exploring the distinctions between Yawists and Elohists as redactors of various texts of the Tanakh.
Note to self - do not do that again...
J
I am of the opinion that there are real problems with this line ot thought and I will give a few thoughts as to why I think this is incorrect. If one wishes to trace ones geneology to Adam and Eve that would be an acceptable endeavor, but to blur the distinction between God and His creation by claiming God as a grandparent is going beyond our privilage as human kind. If we use the biblical text and believe it is accurate to prove our geneology while disregarding the same text that states that mankind is created and contingent and cannot be euated with the eternal God is quite another. If one is of the opinion that you can prove your descent from God as a reason to claim a "godhood" then you are entitled to believe that if you wish. If you are of the opinion (as I am) that mankind is created by God and subject to Him then this line of reasoning is would be offensive.
In the spirit of peace and humility
Daniel