How many people does your tree show?

Started by Private User on Tuesday, June 12, 2012
Problem with this page?

Participants:

Profiles Mentioned:

Showing 1-30 of 70 posts
Private User
6/12/2012 at 1:01 PM

Just wondering what other's trees look like, here is what shows for me at each generation:

% complete generation # of ancestors shown
100% 1 3
100% 2 7
100% 3 15
100% 4 31
100% 5 63
93% 6 118
78% 7 200
67% 8 343
54% 9 554
43% 10 871
33% 11 1354
25% 12 2045
17% 13 2849
12% 14 3799
7% 15 4852
5% 16 5963

6/12/2012 at 4:00 PM

If you have not stumbled upon these already, stumble on in:

Complete ancestors trees - how many we can find on Geni?
http://www.geni.com/projects/Complete-ancestors-trees-how-many-we-c...

Geni Top 10 Lists
http://www.geni.com/projects/Geni-Top-10-Lists/11937

6/12/2012 at 5:23 PM

Matthew,
I'm not sure i understand your data.
For example, are you saying that for your first generation of ancestors (ie "parents") you have 3 profiles?

That seems a little unusual.

Private User
6/12/2012 at 5:27 PM

Yes thats right, 2 parents and 1 son. So you can see that the total # includes all generations before.

6/12/2012 at 5:45 PM

OK, i was trying to work out how you had 7 grandparents. Makes sense now!

Quite an impressive tree.

6/12/2012 at 7:19 PM

I'm very interested in what my mother's side looks like, but don't have time to try to get statistics until July.

On my father's side, it's a lot sparser.

Private User
6/18/2012 at 2:35 PM

Hey anyone else able to get a total? Just go to your tree and see how many profiles its able to show, post #s here!

6/18/2012 at 3:23 PM

Hi Matthews...How do you find out those statistic about the completeness of generations?

Private User
6/18/2012 at 3:35 PM

Hi Suzanne. You can just do the math yourself, for example lets say you have 2 parents then 4 grandparents, then 8 great grandparents and so on. I just looked on my tree and saw how many ancestors it showed for each time i added a generation.

6/18/2012 at 4:03 PM

Hi Matthew, I'm still trying to figure out how you got the number for each generation. I see from my home page that I have 37,675 ancestors. How do I isolate those by generation? If I do it from the tree, I get lost pretty quickly since it branches out exponentially.

6/18/2012 at 4:11 PM

Hi Matthew, at this very moment I'm not able to calculate a figure for each generation because my iPhone will not allow me to view my tree. However, according to Geni, I currently have 56,4219 ancestors. If I may ask, what is your number for total ancestors?

Private User
6/18/2012 at 4:20 PM

Ancestors 7,546,445 for me, Let me know yours too.

6/18/2012 at 5:05 PM

That's an impressive leap up from the numbers you were quoting last week.
"5% 16 5963"

6/18/2012 at 5:22 PM

Oops, I meant 56,419 ancestors but according to Geni, I'm connected to 62,972,838 people on Geni. I truly don't know what the latter number means. Your 7,546,445 number for ancestors is quite impressive!

6/18/2012 at 5:34 PM

Enrique Treat Gleason (Gleeson), Esq. the number 63 million represents the amount of profiles in the World Tree on Geni.
So your family tree must be connected to the giant maze of trees that have been built and connected by Geni users over the last ...decade(?).

Frankly i don't know where Matthew gets the number 7.5 million from as he would need at least 21 generations of ancestors identified accurately to achieve that number (no missing numbers, no double ups).

If he had achieved that he would have the most complete tree on Geni (that honour is currently held by Carl, Herzog von Württemberg (who is a Duke of somewhere in Austria) and has a complete family tree out to almost 12 generations.

6/18/2012 at 5:44 PM

Alex, thanks for the explanation.

Private User
6/18/2012 at 5:47 PM

Oh my bad its 75,464 not that high but still high.

6/18/2012 at 5:58 PM

FYI
2 = parents
4 = grandparents
8 = great grandparents
16 = 2x great grandparents
32 = 3x great grandparents
64 = 4x great grandparents
128 = 5x great grandparents
256 = 6x great grandparents
512 = 7x great grandparents
1,024 = 8x great grandparents
2,048 = 9x great grandparents
4,096 = 10x great grandparents
8,192 = 11x great grandparents
16,384 = 12x great grandparents
32,768 = 13x great grandparents
65,536 = 14x great grandparents
131,072 = 15x great grandparents
262,144 = 16x great grandparents
524,288 = 17x great grandparents
1,048,576 = 18x great grandparents
2,097,152 = 19x great grandparents
4,194,304 = 20x great grandparents

6/18/2012 at 6:01 PM

The are numbers above are per generation, not a running total.

Matthew I think the number you are quoting from tree view would be total relatives shown in tree when you change the number of generations displayed.
That number includes uncles, cousins and cousins uncles (to name just a few) who are all family members but not actually ancestors.

Sorry.

6/18/2012 at 6:04 PM

Carl Herzog Von Wurtlemberg is my 15th cousing once removed

6/18/2012 at 6:17 PM

For comparision Queen Elizabeth II has 7,440 ancestors listed here on Geni.

She has 6 generations of ancestors completely identified on Geni (ie all of her 4x great grandparents) and then most of her tree out to 10th generation (ie her 8x great grandparents).

6/18/2012 at 6:21 PM

Hi Alex again...Queen Elizabeth is my 18 cousins 2x removed..
Where do you find all the ancestors that she has? on her site it show 5000

6/18/2012 at 6:24 PM

Suzanne,
Are you stalking me or just bragging? ;)
Olav posted the link already but here it is again:

http://www.geni.com/projects/Complete-ancestors-trees-how-many-we-c...

6/18/2012 at 6:31 PM

Hi Alex..you are cracking me up...I saw that you are an engineer...like my son in law...that explain why you are so technical...great.....I am not bragging, but I am amazed to see who I am related too...king, queens, Celine Dion, Madonna, some prime minister in Canada, and the list goes on...so this has been quite a ride...and a lot of fun....you can go to bed now....good nite...lol

6/18/2012 at 6:37 PM

I'd love to go to bed now (suffering from flu and daughter had nightmares last night) but as it's 9:30am my boss might be less than impressed about me taking a nap. Lucky he can't see what i'm actually typing!

6/18/2012 at 6:54 PM

Oup, you are in New zealand, it is 9:54 pm here in Ct...so I am going to bed, while you can sleep on your desk.

6/18/2012 at 7:04 PM

Actually, I'm in Perth, West Australia GMT+8.
Have a good night, we'll still be here tomorrow.

6/18/2012 at 8:00 PM

Hi Suzanne, according to Geni, you are my 19th cousin once removed. Most of my ancestors from my fathers' s side come from Connecticut, they were amongst the first early American settlers. My relationship to the others involved in this discussion is as follows:

Matthew Cox is my 9th cousin once removed.
Hatte Anne Blejer is my 9th cousin twice removed.
Melton Bennett is my 12th cousin once removed.
Carl, Herzog von Württemberg is my 13th cousin twice removed.
Queen Elizabeth II is my 12th cousin once removed.

Alex Moes -- Alex, we don't have a connection yet but my DNA test results inform me that I match several individuals living in New Zealand and in Australia and so I am sure I'll find a connection with you soon!

6/22/2012 at 12:25 PM

Alex, you cracked me up when I read the latest on the thread. I did the exact exponential calculations to see how many generations it would take to reach 7.5M ancestors.

Matthew- we are just giving you a hard time. You do have an impressive number of ancestors at 75K. My mother's side is much harder to document, so that explains my 38K in ancestors.

Have a great weekend, cousins!

6/22/2012 at 5:06 PM

I'm glad you're enjoying the posts, however i am not giving Matthew "a hard time". I have already explained how Matthew cannot have 75,000 ancestors listed on Geni.

While he obviously has, genetically, had more than 75,000 ancestors if he had that many ancestors in his family tree he would be the most well documented person on Geni.

If i am incorrect in this statement i will happily delete all my posts in this thread and apologise to Matthew.
If I had to guess the 75,000 number he is referring to may be his Blood Relatives count, my own is at 41,000 without any royal connections so throw in a King or two and 75,000 would be quite reasonable.
Hard to know for sure tho, hopefully Matthew will respond the next time he logs in.

Showing 1-30 of 70 posts

Create a free account or login to participate in this discussion