Just wondering what other's trees look like, here is what shows for me at each generation:
% complete generation # of ancestors shown
100% 1 3
100% 2 7
100% 3 15
100% 4 31
100% 5 63
93% 6 118
78% 7 200
67% 8 343
54% 9 554
43% 10 871
33% 11 1354
25% 12 2045
17% 13 2849
12% 14 3799
7% 15 4852
5% 16 5963
If you have not stumbled upon these already, stumble on in:
Complete ancestors trees - how many we can find on Geni?
http://www.geni.com/projects/Complete-ancestors-trees-how-many-we-c...
Geni Top 10 Lists
http://www.geni.com/projects/Geni-Top-10-Lists/11937
Enrique Treat Gleason (Gleeson), Esq. the number 63 million represents the amount of profiles in the World Tree on Geni.
So your family tree must be connected to the giant maze of trees that have been built and connected by Geni users over the last ...decade(?).
Frankly i don't know where Matthew gets the number 7.5 million from as he would need at least 21 generations of ancestors identified accurately to achieve that number (no missing numbers, no double ups).
If he had achieved that he would have the most complete tree on Geni (that honour is currently held by Carl, Herzog von Württemberg (who is a Duke of somewhere in Austria) and has a complete family tree out to almost 12 generations.
FYI
2 = parents
4 = grandparents
8 = great grandparents
16 = 2x great grandparents
32 = 3x great grandparents
64 = 4x great grandparents
128 = 5x great grandparents
256 = 6x great grandparents
512 = 7x great grandparents
1,024 = 8x great grandparents
2,048 = 9x great grandparents
4,096 = 10x great grandparents
8,192 = 11x great grandparents
16,384 = 12x great grandparents
32,768 = 13x great grandparents
65,536 = 14x great grandparents
131,072 = 15x great grandparents
262,144 = 16x great grandparents
524,288 = 17x great grandparents
1,048,576 = 18x great grandparents
2,097,152 = 19x great grandparents
4,194,304 = 20x great grandparents
The are numbers above are per generation, not a running total.
Matthew I think the number you are quoting from tree view would be total relatives shown in tree when you change the number of generations displayed.
That number includes uncles, cousins and cousins uncles (to name just a few) who are all family members but not actually ancestors.
Sorry.
Suzanne,
Are you stalking me or just bragging? ;)
Olav posted the link already but here it is again:
http://www.geni.com/projects/Complete-ancestors-trees-how-many-we-c...
Hi Alex..you are cracking me up...I saw that you are an engineer...like my son in law...that explain why you are so technical...great.....I am not bragging, but I am amazed to see who I am related too...king, queens, Celine Dion, Madonna, some prime minister in Canada, and the list goes on...so this has been quite a ride...and a lot of fun....you can go to bed now....good nite...lol
Hi Suzanne, according to Geni, you are my 19th cousin once removed. Most of my ancestors from my fathers' s side come from Connecticut, they were amongst the first early American settlers. My relationship to the others involved in this discussion is as follows:
Matthew Cox is my 9th cousin once removed.
Hatte Anne Blejer is my 9th cousin twice removed.
Melton Bennett is my 12th cousin once removed.
Carl, Herzog von Württemberg is my 13th cousin twice removed.
Queen Elizabeth II is my 12th cousin once removed.
Alex Moes -- Alex, we don't have a connection yet but my DNA test results inform me that I match several individuals living in New Zealand and in Australia and so I am sure I'll find a connection with you soon!
Alex, you cracked me up when I read the latest on the thread. I did the exact exponential calculations to see how many generations it would take to reach 7.5M ancestors.
Matthew- we are just giving you a hard time. You do have an impressive number of ancestors at 75K. My mother's side is much harder to document, so that explains my 38K in ancestors.
Have a great weekend, cousins!
I'm glad you're enjoying the posts, however i am not giving Matthew "a hard time". I have already explained how Matthew cannot have 75,000 ancestors listed on Geni.
While he obviously has, genetically, had more than 75,000 ancestors if he had that many ancestors in his family tree he would be the most well documented person on Geni.
If i am incorrect in this statement i will happily delete all my posts in this thread and apologise to Matthew.
If I had to guess the 75,000 number he is referring to may be his Blood Relatives count, my own is at 41,000 without any royal connections so throw in a King or two and 75,000 would be quite reasonable.
Hard to know for sure tho, hopefully Matthew will respond the next time he logs in.