Maj. John Ward - Secondary versus primary sources

Started by Cheryl Adams Rychkov on Thursday, March 8, 2012
Showing all 4 posts

Those researching the John Ward family should be mindful that the county/regional genealogical works, most of which were published between 1890-1940, are secondary sources, and should not be relied upon to establish relationships between various families. They can indeed serve as *supporting* forms of evidence, but only a primary source may establish a relationship. Furthermore, Campbell County Chronicles, while an interesting, quaint sort of read, is not only a secondary source, but it is utterly without citation and written by a hobbyist, not a professional genealogist or professional historian.

The larger point here is that, bearing in mind the difficulties encountered when exploring a family's history, we should all strive not to confuse present and later generations (which most assuredly were done with some of these turn of the 20th century published genealogies).

I have a Reed direct line in New England with a early 20th century book. Wonderful on the later generations but the flights of fancy for the immigrant lines ... (shudder).

Yes, and I know well from experience that Virginians are champions at that sort of tale-spinning as well ;)

Showing all 4 posts

Create a free account or login to participate in this discussion